Franklin High Educators Speak Out; Will Seattle Schools Listen?

 Via Facebook:

"Franklin educators led a sick-out today to protest SPS's frighteningly poor protocols for staff & student safety. We have been grossly mis-represented by SPS & the Seattle Times, so please spread this message."

------------
On December 15th, Seattle Public Schools’ decision to cancel school for students was their response to a credible threat to the building. Despite this valid safety concern, the staff were told to finish our workday in the building “as normal.” If we did not feel safe, we were informed that using personal time was required to leave the building. The message was clear that it was more important to SPS that they can monitor the staff than it was to protect them, even when there are no students present in the building.
Fortunately this threat did not end in tragedy or casualty, however, this event uncovers deficits in protocol, procedure, and communication surrounding a credible threat of violence. This is an opportunity to course correct, create and develop systems that prioritize students, teachers, and staff safety.
The Franklin community needs time to process the events that happened on December 15. We the Franklin staff are using today, Dec 16, to both process our own stress and plan how to support student re-entry with a focus on mental health and student voices.
Our community deserves consistency through a clear plan that advocates for our students and staff’s safety. Even if the threat was truly neutralized last night, more needed to be done for us to feel prepared to reenter the building. Seattle Public Schools District needs to share a clear action plan when an active threat is made against our community.
The District can provide predictability to the community by being more transparent with how decisions are made and communicating with us in a timely manner. More so, SPS can value educators and school staff as humans with emotional and safety needs. It is very disappointing that no SPS communication has mentioned student and staff mental health and anxiety thus far.
Most importantly, in order to address the issue of an increase in violent behavior we need more resources for Social Emotional Learning along with mental health support.

Comments

Robyn said…
Cleveland High School today, appears to be for similar reasons: https://www.instagram.com/p/CXkn3QFLIFz/
12/17/21, 1:55 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more