Seattle Times Editorial Board Hammers Superintendent Brent Jones on Safety

 I think the Seattle Times Editorial Board is growing weary of waiting for Superintendent Jones to actually act like a leader. Meaning, it appears he's all talk and little action. 

First this editorial, Seattle Public Schools leaves community hanging on response to gun violence (bold mine)

There are two schools of thought when it comes to facing problems: Confront them fast and loud. Or go quiet in hopes that they will fade away, forgotten.

But with school safety, factors that can flare into danger — mental health problems, violent rivalries, ubiquitous weapons — don’t go away in silence. They just go underground. The key to thwarting them is creating a sense of security before a shooting like the fatal attack last fall at Ingraham High School, not months after the fact.

Seattle Public Schools Superintendent Brent Jones seemed to recognize this at first, quickly convening a team to review school security districtwide. He also said he would gather a wellness council of mental health professionals, though its mandate was never made clear — at least not publicly. That’s part of the problem. 

Jones assured parents, teachers and students that he would have recommendations from both groups by the start of 2023. Yet with the school year six weeks from ending, there has been only silence. The district won’t even say who, exactly, is on these committees. Why so much secrecy?

The Editorial Board then talks about what Bellevue SD is doing:

Consider Seattle’s neighbor across the lake, the Bellevue School District. After many years of stationing police officers in school buildings, Bellevue took a big step back during the pandemic and came up with a new model. The district then brought that idea to its community, sending out surveys and holding focus groups throughout much of this school year to solicit input from parents and students.

That type of public process — transparent, inclusive — is exactly what’s missing in Seattle.

Where does that leave SPS?

At Ingraham High, parent leaders were willing to be patient in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, trusting that some sort of communication would be forthcoming, as Jones had promised. So they waited through January. Then February. And March. Silence.

“Our trust has eroded,” said Kathleen Zagers, a member of the parents group Friends of Ingraham. “And they’re running out of opportunities.”

Likely, there are liability issues at play. While two students have been criminally charged in the killing of 17-year-old Ebenezer Haile, there may be a civil case coming from Haile’s family. Scrutiny of the district’s policies around weapons would surely be part of it, especially as those procedures haven’t been updated since 2013.

Yes, while the Board plays footsie with the Superintendent over power-sharing, those Board policies and procedures haven't been updated.  

Last week, two West Seattle high school principals sent out messages saying they were assessing threats on social media. The principals communicated with their community. From district headquarters, more silence.

This does not create a sense of security. Nor does it build trust.

No doubt, loose talk on social media can escalate into something that sounds more serious than it is. But kids are reporting these rumors because they are scared. They understand the critical importance of being proactive. The adults leading Seattle Public Schools could learn something from them.

 And what are high school kids in SPS learning from SPS leadership? For Seattle Public Schools,  it's ALWAYS about the money. 

 

Then this one, Fear is an uninvited guest during graduation season, from David Horsey


Six months ago, a 17-year-old student was shot and killed in the hallway of Ingraham High School by a classmate who had a grudge against him. In a month, Ingraham seniors will be able to breathe a sigh of relief when they graduate, having managed to get out alive in a gun-saturated nation, where going to school has become a high-risk activity, but the risk will remain for the kids they leave behind, not just at Ingraham, my alma mater, but at every school in the city.

Seattle Public Schools administrators have yet to convincingly demonstrate how gun violence can be kept out of classrooms. Superintendent Brent Jones says a safety audit has been completed for the district’s 106 schools in the wake of the murder at Ingraham, but a parents group – Friends of Ingraham – is dissatisfied with the district’s failure to provide enough details about the policies and procedures that may be changed.

Comments

Just Saying said…
The Seattle Times needs to cover Franklin High School where many people showed-up to last night's board meeting to complain about safety issues.

Anonymous said…
How tasteless. How do you think the parents of the murdered child would react to this?

just stop
So I'm tasteless for reprinting this or is the Times wrong for printing it? I think the family of the murdered child want justice for their child AND that this never happens to another child. You can't enact change without being blunt.
Stuart J said…
Is there supposed to be some text after the last phrase of the original post:

On that note, there's also this news:
Nope, just me thinking of doing one thing and then abandoning it.

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup