Last Three Days for GET

Washington State's GET program (Guaranteed Education Tuition) is in its three final days for this round of enrollment.  Now, thru the end of May, they will be waiving the $50 enrollment fee.

June 30th is the last date to add to your account if you are already enrolled.

Comments

Andrea Leigh Ptak said…
I highly recommend GET—at least for now. It was the best investment in our college fund portfolio. Wish now we had done more, but we diversified.
5/29/14, 2:08 PM
Financial Planner said…
Those must have been the good ol' days, Andrea. The current price is $172/unit with a payout value of $117. That's a 47% premium. It's hard to believe college tuition will continue to increase at the same rate it has in the past. The last reasonable time to buy in was about 4 or 5 years ago.

Buyer beware. WA GET needs enough people to buy in at current (we can argue possibly inflated) prices to pay out the guarantees made to those who got in early (when it was a screaming deal).
5/29/14, 2:55 PM
Andrea Leigh Ptak said…
That may be true now. I believe we paid about $70 a unit and just cashed it in recently. It did much better than mutual funds purchased in the late-90s.

It still might be a decent buy if you have an infant. At least it is guaranteed tuition.

And I certainly hope the rate of increase for college tuition slows. It's already unaffordable for many, many families.
5/29/14, 10:50 PM
Charlie Mas said…
People who use GET need to understand what it is, and those who discourage it need to understand what it isn't.

It is not an investment; it is an inflation hedge. People who think of it as an investment are thinking about it wrong.
5/30/14, 6:09 AM
Mickle Schewzger said…
Today's education field is totally technology oriented and any student learn much more if he is well aware from the use of the technology for education purpose. In this advanced world, now it has become quite easy to get smart essay writing service from our trusted website which has proven record of student's satisfaction.
12/5/14, 3:31 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more