New Glitch in Downtown School in old Federal Reserve Building
From Publicola (partial):
Last month, federal agencies rejected an application from a coalition of homeless advocates to convert the old Federal Reserve building at 1015 2nd Ave. in downtown Seattle into a comprehensive homeless services center. But homeless advocates like Tristia Bauman "believe that the application was denied…in contravention of federal law” and are calling on the agencies to reconsider the fast-track rejection.
The application, submitted by local homeless services provider Compass Housing Alliance in collaboration with other groups, was officially rejected because of concerns about Compass' ability to guarantee funding, according to a rejection letter from the federal Department of Health and Human Services. (Real Change, one of the center's potential tenants, previously convered the rejection here.) But homeless advocates question this rationale. Bauman, an attorney with the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, wrote in a letter to U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) last month that the denial is part of "a long history of non-compliance with [relevant legislation] by the federal government.” We have a call out to Sen. Murray.
Last month, federal agencies rejected an application from a coalition of homeless advocates to convert the old Federal Reserve building at 1015 2nd Ave. in downtown Seattle into a comprehensive homeless services center. But homeless advocates like Tristia Bauman "believe that the application was denied…in contravention of federal law” and are calling on the agencies to reconsider the fast-track rejection.
The application, submitted by local homeless services provider Compass Housing Alliance in collaboration with other groups, was officially rejected because of concerns about Compass' ability to guarantee funding, according to a rejection letter from the federal Department of Health and Human Services. (Real Change, one of the center's potential tenants, previously convered the rejection here.) But homeless advocates question this rationale. Bauman, an attorney with the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, wrote in a letter to U.S. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) last month that the denial is part of "a long history of non-compliance with [relevant legislation] by the federal government.” We have a call out to Sen. Murray.
In its application to own the property, Compass was joined by two other "Key Participants": the Downtown Emergency Service Center and Catholic Community Services of Western Washington.
The three groups agreed to share responsibility for the property after
converting it into a comprehensive homeless services center---a sort of
central hub for the city's homeless services, which are currently scattered across Seattle.
Consolidating services into one location—making them more accessible to
the homeless—is a central rationale for coalition's desire to move into
one spot.
According to a June 2nd rejection letter from the
Department of Health and Human Services, the reason for the
application's rejection was insufficient information about the center’s
funding. From the letter: “The applicant’s proposal, while it appears
well-thought-out and the key participants have experience obtaining such
funds, too little information is presently provided by the applicant…”
A spokesperson for HHS declined to elaborate on the reasoning behind the decision: "HHS has no further comment on the issue."
HHS was responsible for reviewing Compass' application because the
application involved homeless services. But the agency which actually
owns the property and has authority over the larger process is the
General Services Administration. When HHS asked the GSA for more time to
ascertain Compass' funding sources, GSA said no. Asked why, a GSA
spokesperson said, "GSA moved forward with the disposal process because
[HHS] did not give any indication that it would reverse its decision
after receipt of the additional information to be provided by Compass
Housing Alliance."
I would think if Rep. McDermott (and possibly Senator Murray) support a further explanation of the quick turnaround of the homeless coalition's application, it should be done.
About the district's own resolution about exploring the idea of using the building as a downtown school:
The GSA Department of Education is currently fielding an application from Seattle Public Schools to use the property to establish a downtown school site.
If it doesn’t pan out, the property will go to public auction. But
Eisinger emphasized that homeless advocates “are absolutely not in a
fight with the school district.”
“We are supportive of the idea of a school downtown,”
she said. “But we still think that the federal law calls for the GSA
and HHS to prioritize homeless use. And what we have in common with the
school district is that we all need Title V [of the McKinney-Vento Act]
to be upheld.”
I can ask the district but I think they would agree that the most important issue is for the McKinney-Vento Act (which they, too, are subject to) to be honored. This may hit the "pause" button for the district which might not be a bad thing.
Comments
It's either laugh or cry...
The committee thinks the building should be designated a Seattle landmark to further help ensure its preservation. It contends that the federal agency and the city have blocked this effort. One of the group's attorneys, Peter Eglick, said city staff members' handling of the nomination "fell far short of appropriate standards."
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/2014/07/could-new-lawsuit-block-downtown-seattle-school.html?page=all
Given the confluence of issues with the Fed. Reserve building, and the dysfunction of the district, I think it is unlikely that the building will become a DT school. However, there is an architectural firm that sounds like it's ready to do what is necessary to preserve the building, and that would be a good outcome.
urban core
I shall call you:
Kick 'Em Down the Road Kate!
After all, the location of social services should be done to create parity for Seattle residents, not convenience for the people using the social services.
And while this is not really the forum for this conversation, I also wanted to clarify for 'urban core,' - the downtown core is Pioneer Square/downtown/Belltown. I'm not 'confusing homelessness with low income housing.' Services and housing for the homeless, many of whom are mentally ill and/or dealing with substance abuse, that are very concentrated in the downtown core.