Tuesday Open Thread

Update:  the district let me know that they are working to make sure that Garfield 10th graders can take the PSAT on the same day/time as juniors.  Not sure how PTA got info that it was going away (I suspect GHS administration) but the district is diligently trying to sustain PSAT testing for 10th graders at Garfield.

End of update

Garfield is now only allowing juniors to take the PSAT.


This year all Garfield 11th graders will have the opportunity to take the PSAT. Unfortunately due to space constraints we will not be able to test any other students.

Apparently, 10th graders can still get a practice take-home test. As was pointed out to me, this is a blow to low-income students. Anyone know if this is happening at other high schools?

Robert Eagle Staff MS parents are extremely concerned about pedestrian conditions around their school and are urging parents to contact the City Council.
We are extremely disappointed in the approach that the City and SDOT have taken with respect to safety on 90th. As we understand their response, they are "hoping" to have the no parking signs, 20 mph flashing lights, rectangular rapid flashing beacon (pedestrian triggered), and painted crossings by the end of October. But implemention could happen at the end of December, or it could happen sometime in the spring.
The City's response to this issue is unacceptable. Our kids lives depend on these safety provisions! Please help us push SDOT to reprioritize our children's safety by completing promised safety revisions before dark and rainy winter weather sets in!
“It is urgent that the fixes be applied prior to the end of October. Waiting longer is an unacceptable and dangerous risk. We are approaching that time of year when the rains come, when it is dark, drivers have poor visibility, and the roadway is slippery making stopping more difficult and increasing the likelihood of a kid slipping while darting across the road between traffic. Worse, we are approaching the October rains when pavement markings cannot be applied, possibly delaying them until spring."

—Lee Bruch, Seattle Greenways


“The entire city planning process has failed our kids. It's not like the school just arrived from outer space. The City has been reviewing the plans for three and half years. In 2015, worried that adequate planning wasn't taking place, community groups began their own planning effort. They applied for and received two grants totalling $2.2 million in 2016. The City Council was informed ... and then ... well you see the result."

—James Dailey, FORESMS Safe Routes Coordinator 


Here's what SDOT Safe Routes to Schools says they have done in the area.


I note that Garfield's football team took a knee at their last game, to protest injustice in this country.  Is this happening at any other high schools this year?

(Update: I erred on this reporting; someone reposted an old photo from last year and I wrongly made the assumption that it was from the 2017 football season. My apologies.)

I'm going to the BEX V Work Session today.  What are the key facilities issues that you think that levy should address?

What's on your mind?

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's almost like the goal is to have zero NMSF from Garfield in the coming years...sheesh. Can students request to take it at another school?

lower&lower
Anonymous said…
At our high school (Ingraham) 10 and 11 graders are taking the PSAT. Furthermore, isn't Ingraham over enrollment projection compared to Garfield?

-RamParent
Anonymous said…
Anyone who wants to can take the PSAT right? Does SPS pay the PSAT fee, instead of families? Then is it space constraints, or budget constraints, limiting the number of tests?

FNH
Anonymous said…
I think there is a private fund that pays for 10th and 11th grade students to take the PSAT - from Boeing?
It must be a space constraint from Garfield.

Momof2
Anonymous said…
Wasn't a Washington high school football coach fired a couple of years ago for taking a knee and praying at football games? Why is it now acceptable to do exactly the same thing for a liberal cause? I don't get it.

I'd love to hear some discussion about this.

Puzzled

Anonymous said…
Hmm, I didn't know 10th graders took the PSAT. Only junior year scores count for NMSF qualification, so do sophomores take it just for practice sake?

I suppose that's potentially helpful for the small percentage who have a chance at qualifying the next year and might get there via test prep, but for the vast majority of students the 10th grade PSAT is pretty irrelevant, isn't it? The 11th grade PSAT would be your SAT practice, and then there are lots of study guides and practice tests available.

I'm curious to hear why others--aside from the College Board ($$$)--think that having everyone take the PSAT as sophomores is so valuable. Isn't it just more standardized testing that's not linked to the curriculum? Couldn't they better spend that time in class?

And if it really IS that important, how does the Garfield "space constraints" excuse square with this from the College Board website? The PSAT/NMSQT and PSAT 10 are the same test, offered at different times of year. It seems like if they have room for juniors to take it on one day, they should have room for sophomores on another. Is the 10th grade class really that much larger?

Psst!
Anonymous said…
@ puzzled, it was the praying that was the primary issue, as I recall.

Anonymous said…
Ballard 10th and 11th graders are both taking it this year...

QA Parent
Anonymous said…
Roosevelt's weekly newsletter from yesterday said "the district is providing the College Board PSAT to all 10 and 11 graders." They are doing it in the gym, on an early-release Wednesday. Roosevelt is similar in size to Garfield.

If "the district" is providing it, why would any one high school be able to determine who gets to take it?

RHS SophomoreParent
Anonymous said…
The College Board is a greedy disaster. I had to drive all the way to Vancouver to get a seat for the SAT for my kid, (my kid was doing subject tests) including hours in the car, and a hotel. The next closest seat was Omak, further and without accommodations. For the aOctober sitting, I heard students were going to Bremerton. Talk about unfair to disadvantaged students, not to mention an expensive ecological nightmare to send students to obscure scattered locations all over the state. Why aren't there enough SAT seats anywhere in Seattle? 2 sittings for the PSAT isn't going to make that any difference. Maybe, at most, they'll get one extra NMSF - but it appears that SPS doesn't have many of that level of student. PSAT doesn't count for anything else. But, SAT truly does matter and those scores gate most college entrance.

Parent
JLardizabal said…
Garfield is restricting the PSAT to Juniors only "due to space constraints," yet Ballard, Ingraham, Roosevelt, etc. have all figured out how to administer the test to their sophomores, as well. This is a blow to Garfield sophomores, who will be at a disadvantage compared to their peers when competing for National Merit Scholarships next year (except, perhaps, those students who can afford to take a private course with simulated testing conditions). Most egregiously, Garfield announced this decision only two weeks before the testing date, giving 10th grade students no option to sit for the test elsewhere.
Anonymous said…
If "the district" is providing it, why would any one high school be able to determine who gets to take it?

Because it's Garfield? Methinks their excuse is questionable given that other overcrowded schools - Roosevelt and Ballard - are managing to offer it to all 10th and 11th graders. The value of taking it in 10th is that there is still time to study for the 11th grade PSAT/SAT if needed. The 10th grade score can be a good incentive to study over the summer. Unlike the SBAC and other tests that took multiple days and were next to useless, the PSAT/SAT is taken in one sitting on one day, and can mean real $ for students.

lower&lower
Anonymous said…
Thanks, Garfield! You've shown me who you are, I'll believe you.

This really shows your attitude about putting students first: you don't. Cynics might even think this maneuver was engineered to drive next year's freshmen away from you to other choices -- HCC from Ballard, Queen Anne, Magnolia, Greenlake, Viewridge, Bryant, Wallingford, etc, should go all-in to Roosevelt, Ballard and Ingraham and avoid you. Furthermore, current freshman can out of pull out and head to their reference high school. There's more for them there for 10th, 11th, 12th grades then there will be at Garfield. It's not just this PSAT --- it is ALL of it! Yanking World History AP from freshmen, yanking English Honors from freshmen, introducing 'menotoring' period, a total time-waster, etc. The numbers of bulldog national merit scholars shall drive down to …zero? The master schedule will make gaining access to course that make a student not just college-ready but college-desirable far too difficult as the pool of high achieving students dwindles. Look at all the open Garfield PTSA positions, compare that to 5 years ago. Think about what that lack of enthusiasm will mean when it comes to fundraising and the auction. Who's going to pay for all the learning specialist that help the most vulnerable Bulldogs? The school community has to truly welcome and embrace all learners, or it embraces none. Those who want to boot HCC out should think of the old cliché, be careful what you wish for. It's going to negatively impact everyone.

The bright side? Bulldogs won't have to worry about overcrowding anymore. Look at Rainier Beach, they don't have to worry about overcrowding .


bulldog
Anonymous said…
Does it sometimes seem as if a contingent of SPS read Vonnegut's Harrison Bergeron as a user's manual, not a cautionary tale?

2081
Stuart J said…
There are three dates for the PSAT. Look at this page on the College Board web site.

https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/psat-nmsqt-psat-10/k12-educators/psat-nmsqt-dates

Primary test day: Wednesday, October 11
Saturday test day: October 14
Alternate test day: Wednesday, October 25

Garfield administrators have a choice: they can check out alternative dates, or they can do nothing. Taking the PSAT in 10th can provide some helpful feedback about what topics might be helpful for students to study. Schools really need to drive the PSAT process. With the SAT, as others have noted, you can go to a variety of locations, but with the PSAT, schools are not really set up to take outside test takers. This has been a major challenge for some students at an online school I'm familiar with.

I would suggest some Garfield parents call the College Board and see if it is possible for students to take the test on the 25th.
Jet City mom said…
My daughter actually did much better w the ACT and they werent so hard to deal with about her getting accomodations.

I think that also should be an option for students.
Anonymous said…
On a different subject, can anyone explain to me what pre-calc covers? In my day, it was Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 /trig, then Calculus as a senior, if you wanted it. Does pre-Calc cover something we didn't cover back in the day? In other words, is there more content now in HS math, or is it the same content spread over more classes? And, if you are a real historian, when did the shift happen?

Just Curious
Anonymous said…
Regarding the Garfield PSAT announcement: It is possible that the late date of the Garfield announcement has left 10 graders who want to take the test elsewhere no other options. The testing sites fill up fast (as Parent@10:44 points out). If they didn't want to administer the tests to 10th graders they should have made that announcement earlier in the month to give those interested 10th graders a heads up.

Limbo
Anonymous said…
Just Curious, at my mid west college prep high school back in the 80's, it was:

Algebra 1 (which I skipped since I had it in 8th grade)
Geometry
Algebra 2 plus Trig
Pre-Calculus
Calculus

We had to take Pre-Calculus before we could take Calculus.

HP
Anonymous said…
Posted this on the Friday Open Thread today:

https://southseattleemerald.com/2017/09/25/when-does-rainier-beach-high-school-get-its-turn/

Something I have wondered too. If they want more kids to want to go to Rainier Beach, then they need to remodel it so it is attractive.

HP
Anonymous said…
Re:PreCalc

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/473913/what-is-a-standard-precalculus-
syllabus has a good rundown.

Its definitely, one of the least well defined classes in the math sequence and overlaps Alg II in some topics. (In my High School, you also went from Alg II, to a semester of Trig to Calculus.)

-MIH

Anonymous said…
Could it be that there is no space because the four portables aren't ready yet? Students have been taking classes in other parts of the building that might have been used in the past for test taking. It's really disappointing that families have to learn about this through a blog and not through the administration.

-

Anonymous said…
Thanks MIH; that was a helpful link. I'm thinking it looks like course that pulls from the Algebra 2/Trig and Calculus from my day.

Just Curious
Anonymous said…
Thanks for attending the BEXV work session, Melissa. I'm really hoping that John Rogers will be on the final project list this time around.

-North-end Mom
BEX V will not pass if it doesn't include a complete renovation or rebuild of RBHS. Simple as that. I suspect the Board gets that; whether the staff does is another matter (their goal of pushing kids to charter schools is undermined by SPS actually investing in RBHS...)
HP, many of us are working on giving RBHS the building it deserves. There's a huge racial equity issue and yet most of the people working it seem to be the students at RBHS.

Northend Mom, I can't see how John Rogers wouldn't. Northgate has a sad building but I think it far more reasonable than JR's.

Robert, you sound jaded. Staff ceding SE high school students to charters? Hmmm.
Anonymous said…
From a glance at the work session presentation, it looks like there has been community input collected for a RBHS redesign.

It also appears that there has been a lot of preliminary design work done for other schools/potential projects, much more than what was done at this stage for BEXIV projects, and it does not appear that there has been any community input collected prior to this design work being done.

-North-end Mom
Anonymous said…
I heard from a friend who works at a local community college that McCleary fulfillment is impacting the community colleges, by taking state budget money away from them?

Apparently local community colleges are having major budget issues. Wondering if this will also impact Running start programs at community colleges?

Can someone clarify if this is the case. Sheesh...if true they give with one hand and take back with another. We need to be investing in community colleges!!!

-fed up
I have been quickly looking at the BEX V agenda. In a word, jaw-dropping. Mind-boggling.

21 major projects (plus minor ones) = $1.7B. That's for all projects under consideration. $175M for a downdown high school with stadium. Rainier Beach HS? $50M. That's pretty much chump change for a new high school.

Not going to happen. I myself would NEVER vote in that kind of money to this district.

One of the projects is Franklin High. Wait, what? It was rebuilt in ....1990. Mind you, these are updated but I find it shocking.

One minor project is for South Shore K-8, $225K for classroom sound systems. That, my friends, is a disgrace because that's IS a very new building and BEX has to be for buildings that REALLY need help and shoring up. Not updates like this. I think LEV could front the money for this,given SS K-8 is their project.

$100M just for technology (equipment, operations and support). And another $75M for tech infrastructure.

$75M for business and operations support

I'm thinking they want something north of $1B.

In the past I have mounted modest campaigns against a BEX levy more to let people know the oddities and issues but this one might need a real campaign if it does not look more realistic.

I also note they claim the BMAR (backlog of maintenance and repair) will drop to $100M with BEX V. What staff never wants to admit is that the BMAR is the really major stuff but that the district, as a whole, is NOT maintaining its buildings properly.
I have no problem voting a big chunk of change, even above $1B, to SPS for building construction, as long as the actual needs get met.

As to RBHS, I'm not jaded, just observant. I've heard that exact charge about district staff starving RBHS to help charters from several leaders in the community, and that charge is bolstered by the news in this recent article about emails sent between SPS leadership and Summit charter schools: https://seattleducation.com/2017/09/17/the-stealth-campaign-for-charter-schools-found-in-emails-of-seattle-public-school-employees-and-the-candidacy-of-omar-vasquez/

But just as a political observer, I am pretty sure this will go down if RBHS doesn't get what it needs (and based on the presentation it looks like SPS is finally getting serious about it).

I think most Seattle voters would give $1.7 billion to the district *if* they believe it's going to address the needs at schools.
Anonymous said…
Hale will also offer the PSAT (info below from the Hale email)

"We are offering the PSAT/NMSQT to all sophomores and juniors again this year. The exam will be the morning of October 11th in the main gym and is free of charge. Freshman and seniors will have classes as usual. The PSAT is designed to prepare students for the SAT exam. Students received practice booklets in Mentorship this week and free practice is available at Kahn Academy. Juniors who take the PSAT/NMSQT are screened for the National Merit Scholarship program and other scholarships."

- Hale yes!
Anonymous said…
fed up, McCleary has impacted the entire state operating budget. Not only have community colleges been negatively impacted by the increases in K-12 needed to meet McCleary, so have the 4-year colleges, mental health, corrections, early learning, fire fighting, health care, etc.

Only school districts and certain education advocates are hoping the supreme court increases the sanctions per McCleary and prolongs the lawsuit. The rest of the programs are praying that the court ends McCleary.

Also, McCleary doesn't negatively affect Running Start. Running Start is funded out of K-12 dollars. When basic education funding increases, so does the funding colleges receive for Running Start students.

Cabot Lodge

Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
NO 1240 said…

Center for Reinventing Education (CRPE) latest nonsense:
http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2017/09/crpe-public-schools-should-assist-their.html

There is another report about charter schools and "stranded" costs which, IMO, will lead to the continue decline of public education:

“The report documents and explains in detail what we’ve known for years, that the absurd charter law and inequitable funding system means that this unfettered charter school growth is unsustainable,” said City Councilwoman Helen Gym. “It’s a system that cannibalizes public school districts at the expense of all students.”

http://thenotebook.org/articles/2017/09/13/implications-stark-for-philadelphia-in-charter-report
Ballard Resident said…
Ballard high school is overcrowded. 10th graders will be taking the exam.

To me, this problem highlights the issues of site based management.
Leslie said…
According to Sarah Pritchet ED S. End High Schools and Assoc. Supt. Tolley - all 10th graders @ Garfield and Chief Sealth International Hish Schools will be given the opportunity to take the PSAT.

Also funds for all PSAT testing are baseline, not grants.

Cordially,
Leslie Harris
Director, Dist. 6,
VP, Chair Audit & Finance
leslie.harris@seattleschools.org
206.475.1000
Anonymous said…
Does anyone have the link to the proposed High School pathways that were discussed a while back on the blog? I tried searching but couldn't find the link. Thanks!

QA Parent
Lynn said…
The high school boundaries task force info is here: http://www.seattleschools.org/cms/One.aspx?portalId=627&pageId=20654300

There are maps attached to the agendas for a couple of the most recent meetings but they haven't made any recommendations yet.
Anonymous said…
In a rush to sound hip with "took a knee" without getting too involved
or, God forbid, too close to the real action.

A hit here, followed by a few misses.

lol GladysKravitz
Anonymous said…
Maps are linked with the August 22, 2017, meeting. Two scenarios are shown, E and F, with Lincoln boundaries drawn as far south as Dearborn St. For each scenario they tabulate % of "Non-white, Receiving HCC, HCC Eligible, ELL, SPED, and Homeless Student." Numbers are based on 2016 9-12 enrollment, not projected 2019 enrollment, and the Ingraham planning capacity is shown as 1194 (not the 1700 or so it would be in 2019). Cleveland and Center School are left out, as they look to be tabulating numbers of students in their assigned areas only and not looking at current enrollment patterns. The agenda doesn't provide much in the way of explanation. Where is the next step of projecting numbers for 2019 and beyond (based on 6th grade cohort of 2016 being 9th grade cohort of 2019)?

curious
Anonymous said…
The September 28 meeting notes include Scenarios G, H, and I. Lots to take in.

Scenarios E and F had I5 as a hard east boundary. Scenario G, H, and I change the eastern border to both east and west of I5 and push Roosevelt further north than NE 85th, into Hale's boundary, with some portions of the Hale boundary as low as NE 80th. Scenario H has even more changes, with Ingraham boundaries shifting further south to Green Lake, and Lincoln including all of Queen Anne/Magnolia, and northern boundaries just blocks from the school.

curious
Anonymous said…
The Hale to Roosevelt boundaries are just wonky. Drawing students out from north of 95th, who can easily walk to Hale, while at the same time drawing out students who can easily walk to Roosevelt? Didn't the boundary guidelines include minimizing disruption and maximizing walkability? Are they considering current Metro routes? It looks they are only tallying categories of students.

egads
Anonymous said…
And they kept the Ingraham capacity at 1200. Won't it be 1700 then?

Ram
Anonymous said…
And Scenario I significantly changes the Franklin/Rainier Beach boundaries. What's up with that?

curious
Anonymous said…
The Hale Roosevelt boundaries, I think it has something to do with where the HCC qualified students are. I think they are trying to put more HCC students at Roosevelt. The boundaries are insane from a walkability standpoint. These new boundaries would have put my kid at Roosevelt. My kid would have refused to go to Roosevelt. We would have ended up in private or at Shorecrest.

HP
Anonymous said…
I think they are trying to even it out, actually, move some more HCC students to Hale, and trade them for non HCC students at Roosevelt. This also looks like some elementary/middle school boundaries. The Wedgwood and now Eckstein boundary goes all the way up to Hale in the same way the Hale/Roosevelt boundary does.

I don't think this is a good idea and leaves the district more segregated than if we retained the HC pathway and just worked on teachers to encourage more kids of color to take advanced classes. But I agree it's also not minimizing disruption.

RAM
Anonymous said…
If we are throwing all cards up in the air, why not make Hale an option school? I hear statements like the above all the time- a kid who would NEVER go to Roosevelt and needed Hale, and the reverse, people would NEVER send their kid to Hale, wanted a "regular" high school experience in Roosevelt. Hale is clearly a great experience for some kids, and is not acceptable to many kids. Does this not sound like an option school?

-sleeper
Anonymous said…
I agree Hale should be an option school. It does not offer the same experience as Roosevelt, Ballard, Ingraham. Either it needs to change its program, or it should be an option school. It's not fair to force Wedgwood and other traditionally Roosevelt neighborhoods into Hale if Hale doesn't offer the same experience and courses. And HC students should not be placed at Hale as it currently operates.

Period
Anonymous said…
I also agree re: Nathan Hale being an option school, but wonder what the likelihood is that Lincoln ends up as Hale 2.0, given the principal and where it seems to be heading.

off base?
Anonymous said…

Why does every single issue always circle back to HCC. JHC there's a dedicated blog for HCC , so go there and rant all you want.


So what's it going to be Westbrook? Endless HCC bitching and moaning or something better?

-Tired
Tired, well, this is an open thread, so.

As well, the district itself is making HCC a big deal, including it in with high school boundaries and the SAP.
Anonymous said…
Looks like the Hale/Roosevelt boundaries have been drawn to align with the elementary and middle school boundaries. The JAMS (and proposed new Hale boundaries) would have all the Wedgwood and View Ridge kids going to Eckstein/Roosevelt, even though JAMS/Hale is much closer for a lot of these kids.

JAMS has HCC, which lowers the FRL percentage. With the proposed boundaries, Hale's FRL percentage will probably increase. The boundaries, in general, did not seem to take demographics into account.

I'm perplexed by the Hale should be an option school thing. Is this because of the 9th grade academy structure and time set-aside for mentorship? Doesn't seem to be alt-enough to be deemed an option school. I do think there should be more AP/advanced coursework offerings. A good number of Hale kids go the Running Start route, but I don't know how the number of RS students at Hale compares to other high schools.

-North-end Mom
I think Hale perceives itself as just not like the other traditional high schools. I don't think it's an Option school, though.
Anonymous said…
@ North-end Mom, for me and mine, yes, it's because of the academy approach and the set-aside for mentorship, as well as those extra "support" and "reading" periods. It may be valuable for many, but all that other stuff during the school day is a big turn-off for others.

HF
Anonymous said…
@ HF and others - Do your kids go to Hale? No, then please stop bashing it. Mine does attend Hale and it is a great community of learners - faculty, students, and staff. Hale considers the whole child and the academy structure, Socratic learning, mentorship and other options make for an excellent learning environment. And yes, some kids go to Running Start - just like at GHS, Roosevelt, and Ballard.

-Hale yes!
NNE Mom said…
In the September 26, 2017 BEX V Planning Work Session materials, the district says the capacity for Licton Springs in their old temporary location at Lincoln and in their new location inside Robert Eagle Staff Middle School is set at 100 students. But their projected enrollment is supposed to grow above that. Seems odd that there's no change in the capacity from the old location to the new location.

Also seems odd that Cascadia has room for 150 more kids this year and Decatur has room for 63 more kids this year but the district wouldn't allow the wait list to move for families that wanted to be in the one or the other. So nonsensical. There's room at both. Why not move the wait lists?
NNE Mom said…
Also, Hazel Wolf is apparently over capacity this year by 14 students. But, how did the extra students get in. I have a friend who's been trying to get her daughter into Hazel Wolf and she hasn't made it in yet. There's a wait list. So how did the extra students get into the school? It's not like anyone's assigned to an option school. So how can an option school be overenrolled?
Anonymous said…
re: Hazel Wolf - new-to-SPS students can often get in to Option Schools once the waitlists have dissolved. Super frustrating ....

QA Parent
Anonymous said…
@ Hale yes,

No, not bashing, just explaining why Hale feels different enough, from the outside, that some think it sounds more like an option school. Goodness.

HF

Anonymous said…
Many families like Hale due to its more manageable size. It really feels like you can get to know other families. The academies help with that too. It breaks a larger class up into smaller groups. It also mixes and matches kids from various schools. My kid ended up with kids from their private school 8th grade class, kids from Eckstein, Salmon Bay, and other schools. My kid made some lifelong friends with people they probably wouldn't have hung out with otherwise.

I can see why kids ready for Chemistry or Biology in 9th grade, wouldn't be served very well at Hale but you can start at your math level and language level in 9th grade. I think it works pretty well for everyone else. More AP classes are needed though. Not enough Physics classes and huge Calculus classes were a problem.

HP
Anonymous said…
The Hazel Wolf building's capacity (680 at the time of construction?) is lower than its program size (3-up, K-8, about 720 students). Unless class sizes are reduced, the building will probably always run a little over-capacity.

I'm a Hale parent. Hale has a traditional curriculum, with perhaps more student supports built in than other local schools. Option high schools typically have a curricular focus, like STEM, Arts, etc... My kiddo is doing Running Start this year, due to some of the issues raised by HP, above.

-North-end Mom
Anonymous said…
The last think high school students want is to know other families parents. The second thing they don't want is cupcake participation trophy.

That's the problem with Hale on top of all the super creepy parents that seem to think kids want them at the high school.

GF


Anonymous said…
Updating updated update...

per https://garfieldhs.seattleschools.org/academics/testing

10th & 11th grades can take PSAT on Oct 11th.
the link to specific information states in part...

11th graders need to arrive to school by 7:30, and find their testing room (posted outside main office).

All 10th graders should arrive to the gym by 7:15.

To Bring: Students need to bring their own calculators and #2 pencils.
Students should be dismissed in time for lunch.
After the test? Students will dismissed to school/lunch upon completion of the test.

GHSweary
Watching said…

The Supreme court poised to deliver a blow to unions:

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-unions-20170928-story.html
Anonymous said…
GF, Cupcake participation trophies? What are you talking about? My kid didn't receive any participation trophies. My kid did receive trophies for earned accomplishments. Kid graduated with a decent GPA, SAT and ACT scores, got into some great colleges, and has made the dean's list for two quarters now in college.

You don't know Hale.

Also, other high schools have lots of parental support for sports, drama, music, etc. At Hale, I got to know parents from many groups, not just the ones my kid participated in. Hale works hard at being inclusive.

HP
Anonymous said…
From Watching said...

The Supreme court poised to deliver a blow to unions:

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-unions-20170928-story.html


Of course they will. They are big corporations are people supporters. Especially with Gorsuch on the crew. He always rules against unions.

HP
Jet City mom said…
My kids did not go to Hale, but I volunteered at Garfield( only about 1/3 of time with my childs class), and found the kids to be respectful and appreciative of my time. In general.
There WAS rude behavior on the busses for the after graduation celebration, but I brought my secret weapon, a flashlight!
They did not want what they were doing advertised!
Too bad kids!

BTW, I did not volunteer with AP classes, but with the regular classes.


Anonymous said…
GF,

It may be that many students don't want adult support around. Perhaps they have parents or tutors or college search advisors that provide enough support outside of school. That is not true of every student. There are many other students whose parents don't know how to get science project supplies, or organize their footnotes, or set up an interview with a college rep. Not to mention those who need help acquiring soccer cleats, or eyeglasses, or opening a bank account. Teachers don't have time to fill these rolls. My kid's Seattle high school has over 100 homeless students and more that are food insecure. Adult volunteers are extremely valuable in many roles in our school. It's shocking to me that there are parents who resent that assistance for students.

-Volunteer math tutor

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Who Is A. J. Crabill (and why should you care)?

Why the Majority of the Board Needs to be Filled with New Faces