Kooky Seattle Times is at it again

The Seattle Times printed another love letter to Dr. Maria Goodloe-Johnson on the editorial page. They can't print them on the news pages because they have an obligation to print the truth there.

====UPDATE====
Here's yet another Seattle Times editorial that lauds the work done by philanthropic organizations, blames teachers, and dismisses concerns about corporate influences in our schools.

Comments

Eric M said…
These things are like flares sent up from a sinking ship. Note that they're becoming more urgent and more frequent.
6/15/10, 7:50 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Oh, what I wouldn't say if I weren't a lady. (C'mon, somebody knows who said that first.)

Both Charlie and I took issue with this puff piece. He and I both questioned this assertion:

"A fair question is whether the superintendent is implementing the strategic plan as the board envisioned. The answer is yes."

Huh? Charlie challenged them to name 3 things she's done right and 3 instances of accountability. I double dog dare them.

The Times has the nerve to question why teachers would mention charters and corporations' influence in their no confidence vote petitions. Well, if the Times was keeping up they would know that (1) charters are a big part of RTTT and that (2) ed reforms are coming in large part from wealthy foundations with a huge agenda. Is that wrong? Not necessarily but the Times just can't seem to figure it out.

They seem to be telling us to do more to help her and so I ask how? From my comment:

"And do tell us, Times, how do we help Dr. Goodloe-Johnson succeed? Our PTSAs, rather than just funding enrichment and enhancement, are now funding maintenance and staff. And, Dr. Goodloe-Johnson's attitude towards parents? Dismissive. Sorry, it is not going to be sit down, shut up and raise money for us if we are doing that level of heavy lifting.

But honestly, tell me what I should be doing. Stop writing for the blog, Save Seattle Schools? Stop going to the SPS public meetings and asking questions? Stop going to the Board to point out that many things promised aren't happening?"

What's that smell - oh, it's the whiff of desperation coming from the Times.
6/15/10, 8:33 PM
wsnorth said…
More urgent, more frequent, and more preposterous!
6/15/10, 9:33 PM
dan dempsey said…
There are articles, then there are editorials, then comes pure fiction.

I had no idea pure fiction belonged in the Newspaper.

Is the Times a Newspaper?
6/16/10, 12:14 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more