Youth Making Choices for Seattle

From the City of Seattle via Catherine Weatbrook who sits on the steering committee for Youth Voice, Youth Choice.

What would youth 11-25 do with $700,000 of the City's budget? 

Youth Voice, Youth Choice is a new Participatory Budgeting (PB) Initiative from the City of Seattle. PB is a democratic process where community members directly decide how to spend part of a public budget that focuses on engaging people who have not historically been involved in government, budget processes, or represent underserved communities.

A new project from the City of Seattle called Youth Voice, Youth Choice, empowers youth ages 11 to 25 to share their ideas at one of six upcoming idea assemblies. From those assemblies, project delegates will be selected from the youth in attendance, and those youth all be coached into creating a high level project descriptions. City-wide, those project ideas will be voted on by the youth in our city. The top vote-getters will then be developed by the youth and various departments and other technical resources, into fully scoped and budgeted projects. Those projects will then be put forward in round two of voting! The top $700,000 of projects ranging in size from $25,000 to just over $250,000 will then be funded out of budget money already allocated for this project.

Beyond the opportunity to have youth decide on youth-focused projects in our city, this process engages youth, offers many opportunities for leadership roles, and experience developing project proposals with budgets. 
The first event is January 28th is at Meridian Center of Health, 10521 Meridian Ave N

Other assemblies are:
February 3 from 3 – 5 p.m. at UW Ethnic Cultural Center, Unity Room
February 4 from 4 – 6 p.m. at Greenwood Library
February 9 from 3:30 – 5:30 p.m. at Douglass Truth Library
February 10 from 4 – 6 p.m. at Youngstown Cultural Arts Center
February 18 from 3:30 – 5:30 p.m. at New Holly Gathering Hall
And one more TBD.

No RSVP required. Entire youth groups are encouraged to attend. Please - help spread the word about this amazing opportunities, and remember, it’s the 11-25 year olds that must be the ones at the table here!  

On a personal note, I’m excited for this opportunity to bring a new generation into being active in our city. The City Neighborhood Council, which I co-chair, worked with CM Licata’s office and many others to help make this opportunity possible. Mayor Murray put the funds into the 2016 budget, and the council approved it. 

I am proud to serve on the steering committee helping launch this opportunity in Seattle.  Participatory budgeting isn’t new, but it is new to Seattle. Seattle becomes only the second city in the United States to focus this process on youth. More about Participatory Budgeting can be learned here: http://www.participatorybudgeting.org/about-participatory-budgeting/what-is-pb/

Going forward, I’m hopeful that this process, which is being designed to be more approachable, equitable, cost effective, and flexible than many of Seattle’s existing grant processes, and can serve as a model for rethinking many parts of our budgeting and granting activities in Seattle.

If you have questions, feel free to contact me at catherine.weatbrook@gmail.com, or Rahwa.Habte@seattle.gov

Comments

Anonymous said…
I wonder if they are involving the Seattle Youth Commission on this.

HP
1/25/16, 12:03 PM
Catherine said…
Yes - two Seattle Youth Commission members are on the Steering Committee.
1/25/16, 11:58 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more