Day Four of the Seattle Schools Teacher Strike

Update: schools WILL be closed tomorrow, Tuesday the 13th. 

End of update

I'm guessing nothing happened last night between SPS and SEA. I've visited both Twitter and Facebook and I see nothing new to report. 

One item to remember - even if they found agreement today, it is unlikely they can reopen the next day. SEA membership has to vote and you would hope that could be done in a day. SPS says it's ready to reopen.

I do wonder if SPS is trying to get SEA to split the baby - meaning, more Special Education supports vs more mental health supports. I sure hope not. I suspect that at the Board meeting on Wednesday the new student "board" members might have something to say about what they have heard from school friends about student mental health. 

SEA's webpage has this to say:

The school board is letting our students down
Our strength continues to move the district and we are at the point in negotiations where we are so, so close… we need to keep up the pressure to get the school board and district to make that last movement to get to an agreement that meets students’ needs.

We had planned a member update for last night, but in all transparency, we kept delaying it because we really thought we could get to agreement. Then at 11pm the SPS team passed us the counterproposals we thought could be a deal, but instead they were hugely disappointing. It’s unacceptable that SPS does not understand what our schools need so they are instead distracted by issues that won’t impact our ability to support students.

For example, we are asking for mental health supports, particularly in buildings with the highest need. In their response to us, SPS is applying their either/or, scarcity-based thinking, proposing to give our students just 0.5 FTE social workers in high schools and rejecting our proposal for supports for elementary, middle, and K-8. 

SPS and the school board need to make significant movement to meet student needs in order to gets us to agreement. We are back at the bargaining table with SPS today. We need to take action to compel them to get there. 

Together, we continue to turn up the heat on the school board.

One comment that was painful to read (and I won't say who said it or where) was this from a person after another parent commented on supporting teachers and getting more help for this proposed move of Special Education students to Gen Ed classrooms.

So everyone should suffer for your child to get a little more help?

Parents, please don't make ignorant statements like that. If you even just tried to learn about the issue, you would know that most Sped students don't see their IEPs or 504s fulfilled. It's not about "a little more help" - it's about the Special Education law. 

And if those Sped students are better supported, that means the teacher can support ALL the students in any given classroom in the manner they ALL need. 

Comments

Just Awful! said…
We are reaching a point where graduation ceremonies might be delayed. The strike is impacting every student. I especially feel for K students....many of which probably delayed the start of school due to Covid.
9/12/22, 4:45 PM
Anonymous said…
The educators I talked to today emphasized that the SEA thought it was close to an agreement, and then the district came back with a new demand: cut mental health counseling.

The SEA should not stand for that. If you've ever had a student commit suicide, you know you can't back down on the need for mental health counseling.

DE
9/12/22, 6:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more