This and That

 

This notice of a groundbreaking event at Rainier Beach High School came across my radar late. This notice is not at the district's website nor RBHS's webpage. It is also not on the Board calendar. I have to assume a private group put this together but hopefully the students will be allowed out of class for it. I note that work began on RBHS in June 2022 according to the district's webpage.

I was on Twitter this morning and some teachers were discussing if and how the pledge of allegiance is used at their school. It suddenly came to me that the Board no longer opens their Board meetings with it. I recall several years back when a class of students had come to do a pre-meeting show and they had been seated with the audience afterwards. When it came time for the pledge, I never saw so many panic-stricken faces because some clearly didn't know it - I guess SPS schools allow the principal to make the call. 

The Board president now notes that the JSCEE is sitting on land sacred to Native American tribes. 

Looks like Director Vivian Song Maritz is having a community meeting on Zoom on Tuesday, the 27th from 6:30-7:30 pm. Registration required.

Back to school messaging from Superintendent Brent Jones.  It includes this: This summer, our Safety and Security team conducted walk throughs at every school. The team is implementing new required training for school security.  

If I only lived in Seattle, I would put that to the test. You'll note he didn't say they were going to fix anything; they just did walk throughs.  There IS money sitting in various capital levies but I'd lay odds it will not be put to good use for this purpose. 

Upcoming posts:

- Parents are mentioning fewer language options at schools (even as the Superintendent's message says this "offering virtual courses in American Indian studies, Filipinx American studies and Black studies, as well as more world languages to high school students across the district."  Some complain math options are limited as well.  

- Director regions redistricting. (NOT school boundaries, just director boundaries.)


Comments

Anonymous said…
We should have seen it coming the day we stopped saying the pledge; an abstract ritual is important for building commonality. We can say the pledge, question our leaders/country AND remind ourselves we’re on stolen land. Many principals still have the pledge in their schools. I think it’s also required by RCW so dropping it seems rather petty.

I’ve seen the districtwide elearning language courses advertised many times. It is either not a desirable class or perhaps they have planned to take all comers which seems like an icky way to learn a language with giant classes online. SPS didn’t learn that online learning was a disaster or doesn’t get that language is about relationships…languages are hard enough in person, can you imagine doing this cameras off???

Womp Womp
Anonymous said…
Spring SBA scores recently came out and we saw math scores go down. Wondering if we can find a source for the District that shows year over year growth per kid averaged? There has been so much emphasis on these other "studies" being integrated into curriculum and such a de-emphasis on basics. Id like to see the numbers.

The OSPI metrics seem to have been completely thrown off by the pandemic, as in they no longer offer a lot of metrics they used to.

Basics matter
Anonymous said…
The pledge is a bunch of propaganda crap. The "under God" was added during the Cold War to distinguish us from the "Godless Communists." Looking objectively, it is similar to North Korea mind control-we tell 6 year old children to recite words that they have idea what they mean-if they actually explained it and gave students the option, then I would be OK with it. One of America's greatest strengths is our individuality and ability to think for ourselves; why dilute that with a bunch of words that people memorize without really understanding. We are also very far from being indivisible and giving liberty and justice to all. If we can get to that point, then maybe it would make sense to recite it. -TeacherMom
Unknown said…
The Pledge is what we stand for, what we aspire to, not what we've achieved.

If you won't stand up for the country, why should the country stand up for you when you need healthcare, security, education, etc.

In my experience, eschewing the Pledge is a demonstration of privilege and elitism.

SP
Anonymous said…
Good points, Teacher Mom ( you convinced me!), though the classical education folks would say that eventually those 6 year olds memorizing the words will have a deep understanding that comes from first memorizing then grasping the words over time. I’m very curious what you make of the Duwamish Tribe Land Use Acknowledgement that seems to be replacing the pledge for many groups and meetings…

SPS parent
Anonymous said…
SP-it's not what we aspire to-it's in the present tense: we are promising support. I support my country: I vote, serve on juries and pay my taxes. My country should offer me education, security and healthcare because it's the right thing to do. It's not like my dr asks me to recite the pledge before seeing me. Personally, I would rather have people recite the Bill of Rights-that is much more important. Privilege and elitism? Uh, whatever, I don't see it, but that's your call.
SPS Parent-I see the 2 as having very different goals. The pledge is designed to goad people into supporting the government; land acknowledgements point out a piece of (often missing) history. They are asking people to adopt indigenous beliefs or even support a tribe. If the pledge went something like: I respect our government and the desire to treat everyone equally and justly, then I would be OK with that. Simple words that make sense.-TeacherMom
Anonymous said…
Ah! A dialogue- I like it TeacherMom.

I think you accidentally forgot the word ‘not’ in your sentence, “They are asking people to adopt..”

I know this is probably an error, but speaks to the wide variations in land use ‘acknowledgements.’

They seem to vary from mere acknowledgement and recognition of the original inhabitants of our land like the Duwamish one:

”I would like to acknowledge that we are on the traditional land of the first people of Seattle, the Duwamish People past and present and honor with gratitude the land itself and the Duwamish Tribe.”

To some others that are more muscular and would certainly produce cognitive dissonance to the children taught at home to not feel particularly guilty about western property law. The Salish people’s:

We acknowledge that we occupy the ancestral lands of the Coast Salish Peoples, in particular the Tulalip, Snohomish, Stillaguamish, and Sauk-Suiattle Tribes. We see you, respect your right to sovereignty and self-determination, and are committed to being better listeners, learners, and in lifting indigenous voices.

‘Occupy’ is an interesting word to dig into linguistically (you can google it!), but most people recognize possible connotations of seizing and illegitimacy….And that’s a fine perspective to teach and discuss, but to make an expectation of reciting over and over feels a bit much.

SPS Parent
Anonymous said…
SPS Parent-I agree-a dialogue! Yay! Thanks for catching my mistake-I tend to think faster than I type. You're right about the variety of land acknowledgements; I prefer the brevity of the historical significance: we are on this land, it was sacred to others and we understand the problems with it. I admit it gets clunky when there is more. As for the expectation of reciting it over and over-that puts it on par with the pledge-do people get tired of hearing that?-TeacherMom
Anonymous said…
Not to worry, at the rate we’re going América will look very different in just a few years. When folks can’t agree on basic truths or pledge community support, it falls apart pretty quickly. Some folks are ready for a reboot anyway, but there are no guarantees the future will be any better.

Sunsets
Anonymous said…
Well, if brevity and historical truth are the goal, then why not acknowledge the real truth:
We are a warlike people and have earned our sovereignty by victory. Losses have consequences, we pledge allegiance or suffer them. We aspire to fairness and care not much for what has come before. We’re all here now, and mostly we have no memory of a past. Given those limitations, we welcome all to join.

Truth

Anonymous said…
If you're living on "stolen land" shouldn't you give it back?

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Education News Roundup