Want to Talk Education with your Legislator? Here's where they will be

From the Seattle Council PTSA:

36th District Town Hall meeting
(That's Queen Anne, Magnolia, Ballard and Phinney Ridge)
Saturday, March 14. Time and place TBD.
Rep. Reuven Carlyle
-
37th District Town Hall meeting
(That's Madrona, Columbia, Rainier Valley, Rainier Beach)
Saturday, March 14, 1 p.m. at Garfield Community Center, 2323 East Cherry St., 98122
Rep. Sharon Tomiko Santos
-
43rd District Town Hall meeting
(That’s Wallingford, Fremont, Capitol Hill, Ravenna, Madison Park)
Saturday, March 14, 1:30 p.m. at First Baptist Church, 1111 Harvard Ave.
Rep. Jaimie Pedersen; Rep. and House Speaker Frank Chopp
-
46th District Town Hall meeting
(That's Greenwood, Northgate, Lake City, Laurlehurst)
Saturday, March 14, 1 p.m. at Meadowbrook Community Center, 10517 35th Ave. NE
Rep. Phyllis Kenney, Rep. Scott White, Senator Ken Jacobsen
-
Don't see your district or representatives? Contact them and encourage them to set up or participate in a Town Hall meeting while the Legislature is in session. Don't know you district? http://apps.leg.wa.gov/DistrictFinder/default.aspx

Comments

Charlie Mas said…
I mean this in the nicest possible way, but what is the point of talking to your legislator about state support for schools?

All of the delegates from the Seattle area will tell you that they are all for more money for schools. Is there even one of them that you have to convince?

They will all tell you that they are already doing everything they can. So is there something you can say to them to make them more effective?

Where is the value in meeting with these people and letting them tell you how much they agree with you and how hard they are working to get more money for schools? They go to Olympia every year and every year they fail to bring back education funding reform - some years they even fail to bring back education funding. But we keep re-electing them.
3/4/09, 3:42 PM
Mr. Edelman said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
3/4/09, 4:10 PM
Mr. Edelman said…
Charlie,

You think there is no value in talking with them at all?

If you suddenly found yourself face to face with a legislator, is there nothing you would say to him or her?
3/4/09, 4:11 PM
Charlie Mas said…
I guess I might ask them what they perceive to be the obstacle to adequate education funding and what they are doing to clear that obstacle.

How is it that everyone can agree that we should do something and we still end up not doing it?

Right now I would remind them that the federal government has sent them stimulus funding specifically for schools and encourage them - in the strongest possible language - not to siphon off any of that funding for other purposes.

But I don't imagine that anything I said would have any influence over their actions. They're going to do what they're going to do regardless of my input.

People like you and me just don't rate with them. I'm not sure who does. Maybe contributors, maybe party officials, maybe the media. I don't know. Once in office, they are practically guaranteed re-election for as long as they care to run. Why should they listen to anyone?
3/5/09, 9:04 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more