Board Meeting Agenda for Wednesday

It seems like a shorter agenda than usual for the upcoming School Board meeting on Wednesday, the 19th at 6:00 p.m.

They will be having an Executive Session before the meeting on Collective Bargaining and Professional Negotiations. This is likely to be in advance of upcoming negotiations for both the teachers' contract and principals' contract. These negotiations will be interesting this year as the district has no money to offer and so it becomes all about what the school work day will look like for teachers and principals. I have to wonder how Dr. Goodloe-Johnson's lack of experience with unions may play into these negotiations. I know the district has already hired a professional negotiator.

As for the agenda itself, there are these items:
  • action on the renaming of Brighton Elementary to Martin Luther King, Jr. Elementary
  • action on acceleration of BTA III for the new SAP - This one is a bit weird to me because it is highlighted as "amended motion". So does that mean it was amended after they voted it in as an Introduction item? Isn't it a different motion now? The original motion was only for $8.5M Basically they need capital money to reopen the schools needed for the new SAP and they want to borrow $12M from our capital eligible fund over two years AND borrow federal bonds via OSPI up to $17M. I knew this would come as they didn't have the ready cash to get these projects done otherwise. However, it does appear, from the motion, that we will then have some modest delinquencies/late payments on BTA III because of it. The money would, of course, be paid back to the CEF went BTA III levy money comes in starting in the fall of 2011.
  • Under Introduction Items there is a wonderful proposal for the CTE Skills Center from Michael Tolley, High School Director and Shep Siegel, who runs CTE for the district. You can tell just from the typeface that this is not your regular motion. Detailed, clear, wow. Their attachments make great reading; nearly every high school would eventually have a satellite program with a different focus from green energy to health sciences to marketing. (My only nitpick is just that STEM at Cleveland would get a program right away so more money to that school - it's an embarrassment of riches with a new building, new program and a new CTE program).
  • Also under Introduction Items is another great one from Security for a Public Access Automated Defibrillator (AED) program that wouldn't cost us (training, maintenance and equipment comes from grants). Good deal especially for those times when a student needs the help (could save a staff or parent life as well).

Comments

Unknown said…
Just an fyi, I will be on the east coast during the upcoming board meeting. I am attending the dual graduations of my twin sons. No more tuition - YES! Kay Smith-Blum
5/16/10, 1:20 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Congratulations to you, Kay. That must be a source of great pride in your family. Have a great time!
5/16/10, 5:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more