Washington State PTSA Survey

I can't remember right off-hand if I posted this before but the Washington State PTSA is taking a survey of legislative priorities of parents for education.   The deadline is Sunday, September 25th. 

Comments

stopcharters said…
One of the issues on the survey is whether the state PTA should vote for allowing charter schools in the state of Washington.
9/23/11, 10:46 AM
Sahila said…
@stopcharters.... and we all know that the co-opted PTA is in favour of that....
9/23/11, 11:02 AM
dan dempsey said…
Hey Sahila absolutely correct...

the PTSA got a big grant from Gates.... Bought is Bought ... so of course the Leadership deciders are all for charters (but have to pretend otherwise).

Please folks take the survey and...
speak up on the survey with comments.
9/23/11, 11:16 AM
Anonymous said…
Another "Heads I win, Tails you lose" survey, huh? Gotta hand it to them: Big money and their minions never give up. WSDWG
9/23/11, 12:01 PM
Anonymous said…
I took the survey and was deeply disappointed in it. They bundled issues together in such a way that you'd have to say you agreed with everything or nothing. There was also no clear way to state that I did not support charter schools or merit pay. Some of the questions were downright confusing. It was definitely a do-you-still-beat-your-dog type of survey in my opinion.

Sorrel.
9/23/11, 12:30 PM
Kathy said…
At this point, the Seattle Council PTSA has not taken a position on this issue.

I noticed our school collects $4500PTA fees and pays $3300 to Wa. State PTSA. It is a nice chunk of change...particularily if you don't believe in charter schools.
9/23/11, 1:07 PM
Kathy said…
I need to clarify- At this time, the Seattle Council PTSA has not taken a position on charter schools.
9/23/11, 1:09 PM
Bird said…
Our school just started requiring PTA membership to partipate in after school activities.

Is this common at other schools?
9/23/11, 1:36 PM
Anonymous said…
Bird that bites. what school?
9/23/11, 1:42 PM
Sahila said…
Well Kathy.... you'd better have a word with the Ramona/Heidi duo then.... all the PTSA stuff they've been sending out over the past three months is pro-charters....

whoa, where did that come from?

whoa, where did that come from, part 2
9/23/11, 2:03 PM
stopcharters said…
@Sahila - because the PTSA leadership supports charters, that doesn't mean the PTSA supports them. That won't be decided until the state legislative assembly on October 14th & 15th, which, other than the survey, is the only time PTSA members can have their voice heard. Folks who are concerned should bring it up with their PTSAs, and find out who at their school is going to be voting at the legislative assembly.
9/23/11, 2:32 PM
Sahila said…
in my watching/listening from the sidelines experience, the PTSA leadership is not very forthcoming with both sides of the evidence, so that its membership can make an informed decision....
9/23/11, 3:00 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Bird, what reason was given for the policy? It seems that if you pay whatever the fee is for the activity, that it shouldn't matter if a parent/guardian is a PTA member.

I'm not sure but this may violate some PTA bylaw.
9/23/11, 3:49 PM
peonypower said…
@Kathy
Here is an alternative idea to having that $3300 go to the state fund. Only PTSA members can vote but a school PTSA does not vote on much, and usually only board members. Ostensibly you could attend PTSA meetings, be active, and never pay the PTSA membership fee and have a vibrant PTSA group. Perhaps you could have a PTSA donation fund for the school so the PTSA money goes straight to the school and not the state PTSA fund. That would be one way to deflate the charter/merit pay/ steam engine of the state PTSA leadership.

signed- another way to beat the system
9/23/11, 7:54 PM
lendlees said…
@Bird-It might be an insurance issue. Some PTA insurance requires any 'sponsored' event (such as before/after school classes) to have PTA membership in order to be covered.
9/24/11, 2:27 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more