Missing TFA Corps Member Found... in Renton
Remember that Teach for America corps member who was maybe hired to teach a special ed class at Aki Kurose but then wasn't because she wouldn't return the District's calls? Turns out that she's just fine. She got a teaching job in Renton.
Think about that. When fully trained, experienced teachers can't find a job, this Teach for America corps member found two!
Ann Dornfeld tells the story on KUOW.
Think about that. When fully trained, experienced teachers can't find a job, this Teach for America corps member found two!
Ann Dornfeld tells the story on KUOW.
Comments
Whom do these Board members represent? If they are not listening to their constituents, then who are they listening to?
Then the TFA lovers, led by Generalissimo DeBell and yellow journalist Lynn Varner, berate four board directors for even DARING to question these fine youngsters qualifications....
TFA and their cronies are in the wallow together.
Funny, kind of the reverse of "the artist formerly known as Prince". Aun's name has only been spoken in meetings, nothing provided in writing. Board directors are expected, and the Exec Comm agreed to, intro/act on "the TFA who wants to be known as Elroy Aun", based on the assurances by staff that he's met all necessary qualifications.
Where has staff been wrong/misled in the past?
* It seems not too long ago (last week) that a proposed SpEd TFA did not have any SpEd credential. Staff claimed she had an endorsement in SpEd based on passing the Basic Skills Test in reading, math and writing. Huh?
* Staff continues to misreport the status of remaining TFA in our schools. 50% are no longer teachering in their assignments, NOT 1 out of six.
* Holly Ferguson had to be forced to confirm whether any of the TFA actually took and passed their WEST-Es as required by the RCW, two had not.
* Staff knew the TFA Spanish teacher took his WEST-E in Bilingual Education, but they put Spanish on the Board Action report.
* Buildings used defective hiring teams that did not comply with the CBA. Aki's had two administrators and the teacher development coach (can we say "job security"?)
* etc
But, I'm not so concerned about one hire. I dislike the lack of transparency, the duplicity, and the sleaze. I thought that was going to end with a new superintendent - someone who put children first.
Apologies, again. Thank you for your consideration.
______
-Oompah
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20120913/NEWS01/709139957
Public School Parent
Maybe the experienced teacher had bad references and poor interviewing skills and is thus unemployed while the TFA person was a more appealing hire.
yer talking about the prospective TFA hired who a)misrepresented her credentials; and b) refused to answer phone confirming those credentials.
Yeah, the inexperienced teacher may have had stellar "interviewing" skills, but pretty much miss the mark on everything else.
Based on the TFA claque, which often gives each other's personal info as references, none of the important due diligence sh** matters. Their's is an ideological battle that hapless rubber-stamping board directors are only all too willing to play along.
The interviewing skills nor the "bad references" wasn't instrumental in the case of the experienced Teacher I spoke with. He made it quite clear that direct answers were provided-including information regarding extra grant funding that would've benefited the school(s) he interviewed at (one of his credentialed areas is in P.E. and this department was awarded a PEP grant last year). His references were also from respected Administrators-either still employed or retired from the district.
Its no secret that certain districts (IF not all districts) tend to target and "black-ball" a lot of experienced Teachers, thus keeping them from receiving fair consideration for positions that even the interviewers know they can perform.
Yet in the case of this TFA individual, she was hired in secrecy.
There's still something not right.
Thanks, ELB
-skeptical-
Maybe a teacher who teaches AP could clarify for me? I'm sorry I assumed I knew what I was talking about here!
Snarkie
ELB
Most constituents do not testify at board meetings nor blog. I bet most run of the mill constituents have a favorable opinion of TFA.
Reader
If my guesses are correct, I suppose you could call it a favorable opinion, but it doesn't really feel like that to me. I would contrast TfA with what seems to me like a fair amount of "real" charter school support. I also disagree with that, but my sense is that the "force" -- the actual conviction -- behind charter school support is a little more robust, unless people actually think through the bill's language and look at how the negatives of charters (hard to close, few or no controls by taxpayers, selectively discriminatory admissions, etc.) have played out in other states. That is a lot of work, and many won't bother to do it.
On what do you base that conclusion? Perhaps TFA's 24/7 marketing program? Proven results that pass muster?
I thought not.
I have tried to be very careful not to write disparagingly about Teach for America in general and to be certain not to write disparagingly about the corps members.
I think that Teach for America's expansion into areas that are not experiencing a teacher shortage is a bad idea and I oppose that, but I can oppose that policy and practice without having an unfavorable opinion of Teach for America in general.