Seattle School Board Retreat

There are no Director Community meetings tomorrow as they will all be at the Board retreat.  It is open to the public for observation only.  Agenda.   Their stated "outcomes": Team (working as), Roles (Board roles) and Strategic Plan (affirming Core Beliefs for the development of a strategic plan).

I'm sorry but I thought the policy worked out last December/January DID define Board and Superintendent roles.   A whole day to talk about how to work together and what their core beliefs are to move the district forward and no specifics?  This smacks of the Alliance and I have wonder who came up with this agenda. 

And we wonder why more doesn't get done in our district.

One (slightly) humorous note is that they will be discussing the Senior Leadership Survey.  Many of senior leadership are either brand-new or interim and I'm sure their input could be valuable but again, the most important thing to discuss?  And really, I think all the staff at JSCEE could give some valuable input if asked.

It is from 10:30 am to 5:30 pm at the Talaris Conference Center, Maple Room, 4000 NE 41st Street.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Maybe instead of yet another retreat they could get their tails in gear in looking at 2013 enrollment, which is likely to bring the whole house o cards down in a debacle of nonplanning.

Then again, it would be admittedly smarmy fun to watch the group interact knowing the reign of DeBell has ended. Bodylanguage should be priceless. Hope someone observes.
11/30/12, 4:00 PM
Anonymous said…
That was DistrictWatcher above.
11/30/12, 4:01 PM
mirmac1 said…
After reading all the emails w/ Sara Morris, Karen DeMorest and Debell, agenda doesn't surprise me. Frankly, if I were a board member, I wouldn't waste my Saturday and yet another one of these navel-gazing gabfests. No wonder we go nowhere fast.
11/30/12, 4:39 PM
Charlie Mas said…
This agenda is just dreadful, but the reason it is so bad is stated right at the top. It is the first itme of business:
10:30
Grant update – areas of work, annual plan
Karen Tollenaar Demorest

They are doing this work at the retreat because this is the work that the Alliance is paying them to do.

Now let's take a moment and think about whether that is a good way for elected officials to operate.
11/30/12, 5:01 PM
Charlie Mas said…
Wouldn't it be great if they really talked about the Board's roles:

1) Represent the community's interests and concerns to the District.

2) Governance - write and enforce policy and set strategic goals.

3) Oversee management to confirm that it is consistent with policy and direction.


That's the Board's role. That's what they should be doing.
11/30/12, 5:03 PM
ConcernedSPSParent said…
What makes you say DeBell is on the way out?
11/30/12, 6:04 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
DeBell has said publicly that he is not running again (and his term ends next November). His term as President will end within weeks so his ability to manipulate will be lessened.

Where will he go? I wonder if one or more Board members might jump ship either to one of the two open seats on the Board of Education come January or to the Charter Commission.
11/30/12, 6:18 PM
Anonymous said…
Very odd that enrollment/capacity management is not on the agenda. Guess they are waiting for the work session Wed?

-North End Mon
12/1/12, 11:59 AM
Anonymous said…
The alliance seems like a super board. I attend lots of community engagement events,I see and sometimes get the chance to talk to elected board, but it is not transparent, the alliance role.

Also this focus on senior leadership surveying, is thete a true fuclnctional purpose? Who are the seniors?

Reader
12/1/12, 1:04 PM
seattle citizen said…
Am I mis-remembering, or is the Strategic Plan funded by a Gates grant? Wasn't it created....four years ago, filled with all the modern reform jingo, and paid for by Gates through the Alliance? Or am I thinking of something else?
12/1/12, 8:08 PM
seattle citizen said…
Ah, yes, here it is, all seven million dollars worth - To see all the other millions Gates has spent buying public education in Seattle, go to the Gates grant search engine and use the search term Seattle Public Schools...(Word Verifier says to USEHIM, I guess that means Gates using one or more of the board members?)

Alliance for Education
Date: November 2008
Purpose: to support the college-ready curriculum, assessments, data and advocacy elements of Seattle Public Schools' strategic plan
Amount: $6,929,430
12/1/12, 8:16 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more