OSPI Releases New Data on Student Discipline

OSPI announced today the release of new data on student discipline.  According to the press release:


In May, OSPI released data that answered the questions, “How many students are suspended or expelled?” and “Who is suspended or expelled?” 

This time, the data answer the following questions: 

“How many times were students suspended or expelled?”
“How long were they removed?” and
“For which behaviors?”

From the OSPI K-12 Data and Reports page:

Data Files
You can see that the last item - Discipline Behavior - is the one with the newest information.  I have not had time yet to review this new information but wanted to put this out for readers to have.  

OSPI Discipline Equity website for more information and resources

Comments

mirmac1 said…
Ironic that OSPI has this data but, if you listen to Pegi McEvoy, SPS has no clue of any of this.....
12/7/15, 1:40 PM
Anonymous said…
this link might be useful for anyone who wants a quick state-wide overview:

http://k12.wa.us/DataAdmin/PerformanceIndicators/DataAnalytics/DisciplineBehaviorRollOut.pdf

LisaG
12/7/15, 1:59 PM
Anonymous said…
LisaG

This .pdf suggests that this data was not collected in reference to students with disabilities. There is no information about students with IEPs and disciplines. Can this possibly be the case? Absolutely mind-blowing, if so.

Exasperated reader
12/7/15, 2:32 PM
Anonymous said…
Exasperated reader:

That's strange that it is not in the .pdf
There is some data looking at special education in the different spreadsheets. Spoiler: the statewide numbers are not good.

LisaG
12/7/15, 7:39 PM
Carol Simmons said…
The Seattle Public Schools Data Profile District Summary that was discontinued in 2010 needs to be resumed. Director Peters requested the Staff report on doing this. When will the Data Profile report Document be resumed?
12/8/15, 4:28 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more