"We Can't Make an African-American White"

This from a Michigan state lawmaker, Marty Knollenberg, who was reviewing state K-12 test scores. 

State Sen. Marty Knollenberg (R) made the comment during a hearing Thursday after seeing state data breaking down academic performance among different demographic groups. The data indicated most students who were struggling were students of color, Knollenberg later told WXYZ Detroit.

"You mention why these schools districts fail, and you mention economically disadvantaged and non-white population are contributors to that. And we can’t fix that. We can’t make an African-American white," he said at the meeting. "That's just, it is what it is."

A spokesman for Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) told WXYZ that the state officials presenting the data specifically did not suggest causality between race or economic status and academic achievement. 

But Knollenberg told WXYZ that his comments were taken out of context, noting that he had an African-American employee, and offered to apologize to people who felt offended.

Apparently Trump's "I can say anything and get away with it" mentality is rubbing off on some.

Shameful.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm not defending this guy, I know nothing about him and he may well be an unrepentant racist but - when I saw that statement i didn't immediately see it as derogatory. I don't know if this was what he intended or meant, but to me saying "you can't make an African American white, is an acknowledgement of multigenerational impact of the past hundreds of years history of enslavement, persecution, discrimination, unequal opportunity to education, jobs etc, poverty -that underlies the socioeconomic, and therefore educational disparity, we see today between AAs and whites. Of course you can't make AAs white - it is not about the color of the skin or any fundamental genetic difference -but rather the fact that for hundreds of years and even in the present day, generations of whites have been born and raised with many advantages and none of the burdens that generations of black people in the US faced - we can't change the shameful history that has lead to differences in outcomes we see today. The question is how to we change and improve things moving forward?
Thats how I see it anyway but I don't know if that's how it was meant.

Not racist.

12/7/15, 9:33 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Not racist, all you said could be true. I would just expect an elected official to be much more careful with his words and make sure that he said what you think he said. His original statement is clumsy at best and racist at worst.
12/7/15, 10:26 AM
Anonymous said…
" generations of whites have been born and raised with many advantages and none of the burdens that generations of black people in the US faced"

Your statement is probably the most racist I've seen NOT deleted from this blog.


White women
12/7/15, 4:24 PM
Anonymous said…
Dear White Woman,

Read up on white privilege. You have it whether you recognize it or not.

Another white woman,
HP
12/8/15, 7:54 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more