Seattle Schools Issues Statement on Drinking Water

“The Seattle Public Schools considers student health and safety as a top priority. Over the last several years we have adopted and implemented a set of rigorous standards which have set nationally recognized standards for safe drinking water quality in public schools.

The program was established by the School Board, which adopted a Drinking Water Policy in 2004. It includes periodic testing of each drinking water source in each school, coupled with reporting of the results on the District website.”
Here's a link to the Drinking Water Testing program.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think we should give credit where it's due here and thank the former school board and district leaders for implementing the policy back in 2004 and continuing it. It was reassuring to read the results for buildings my kids have been in and see they all pass the test. (Of course, one hopes the results weren't doctored in any way, but I'm going to assume the best here.)

-ML Mama
4/26/16, 9:34 PM
Anonymous said…
Articles from 2003-04:

http://old.seattletimes.com/html/education/2001806101_water03m0.html

http://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/health/article/Lead-tainted-water-in-Seattle-schools-stuns-1148516.php

http://old.seattletimes.com/html/education/2001970540_lead02m.html

-parent
4/26/16, 10:06 PM
Ms206 said…
I agree with your comment. Give credit where it is due, and it appears that the school board has been proactive about safe drinking water, not reactive in light of the Flint water crisis.
4/27/16, 2:37 PM
Ms206 said…
I agree with your comment. Give credit where it is due, and it appears that the school board has been proactive about safe drinking water, not reactive in light of the Flint water crisis.
4/27/16, 2:37 PM
AE2 Parent said…
If you want to give credit where credit is due ... then the credit is due to a parent who worked tirelessly on this issue for years.

Parent activism is given many bad names but it is also how things change.

The PI articles starts with a parent at AE2, because one of the AE2 parents worked on this issue for years and then served on the BEX oversight committee. The BEX oversight committee was create in part because of that activism.

4/28/16, 6:03 PM
Anonymous said…
AE2 Parent and parent -

Thank you for the historical context. I wasn't a parent when those old articles were written, and while I've been a parent in SPS for a number of years now, this is before my time or awareness. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that the current policy was implemented after parents pressured the district; seems like most positive changes in SPS happen that way.

-ML Mama
4/28/16, 8:03 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more