Community Meeting at Rainier Beach High School

Hello

I saw this notice in the Rainier Valley Post (the best source for SE Seattle News) and thought it would be a good idea to pass it along to the SSS blog readers. Other than posting this notice I have no connection to this meeting

The community is invited to join the Rainier Beach High School PTSA next Wednesday, November 10 for a community at the Paul Robeson Performing Arts Center at Rainier Beach High School (8815 Seward Park Ave. S.) from 6:30 to 8 pm.

This meeting is open to all Rainier Beach area residents, as the PTSA would like to know what programs interest the community the most and encourage residents to send their children to Rainier Beach High School.

There are five programs currently being considered for implementation at Rainier Beach High, including International Baccalaureate, Law Magnet, IT (that includes a vocational track), Sports Medicine, and an Arts Program.

For more information, please contact Carlina Brown at linab2000@yahoo.com or Rita Green at getbusy40@clear.net.

I hope many of you who have contributed your thoughts on Rainier Beach HS will be able to attend.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Michael, while the RVP may be a good source for news about the valley, the comments on this story (and others like it) indicate that the residents in that area who read that blog think that RBHS is a giant cesspool of drugs, out-of-control youth, and to quote one of them, that an IB program there would be a "f*ing joke" while another would send her kid (who's still in a stroller) there "over her dead body".

I fear that the parents who want to turn the school around and get a buy-in from the more upscale area residents will not succeed in attracting any of them.

However, since I have a middle schooler who will hit high school just as whatever changes made to RBHS begin showing results, I will be at that meeting. I know some of the parents and students of kids who chose the school deliberately and want to support them.
11/7/10, 2:46 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Boy, I wish they had picked a night without a district meeting; that's the same night at the NE Regional meeting. We'll have threads for both and hopefully, there will those attending both.
11/7/10, 3:21 PM
SolvayGirl said…
Even though we're pretty much set for high school, I'm planning on attending. I want RBHS to be a successful school for the whole attendance area.
11/7/10, 4:38 PM
Jet City mom said…
Isn't the reason why magnet programs were placed at Garfield originally, was because it was as popular as RBHS?

I hope the community not only gets their say- but is acknowledged.
11/8/10, 10:01 PM
Anonymous said…
Yes, Emeral Kitty, Garfield was once not a school of choice-it was a school only neighborhood kids were "stuck" at. Moving APP there (and at the time it was NOT well-received) has helped to make it a "popular" school. But don't be fooled-there is a two-tier system there that's existed ever since.

My daughter who swam for Franklin (yes, it really does have a swim team) was appalled to see that even at sporting events that Garfield students did not sit together and cheer for their teams as a group, but segregated themselves. And I've heard stories from minority parents and students for a decade about being quietly discouraged from enrolling in the AP classes.

If APP or another popular program moves into RBHS, parents are going to have to work like dogs to make sure that doesn't happen there. It's going to require a buy-in from parents, teachers, counselors, AND community, and of course the district. Having seen the way locals talk about RBHS I'm not sure they can pull it off.
11/9/10, 8:29 AM
Jan said…
Agibean: how recent is your information? When I go to Garfield events (and my child swims), I don't see groups separating themselves, and they all seem to cheer for each other, and the same is true of basketball. And the last I knew, there was a strong effort within the school to get minority kids to take AP classes.

I don't suggest for a minute that the school is totally colorblind --getting kids to mix across some really disparate income and culture barriers is an ongoing challenge, but what I see (still too few minority kids in the A orchestra and in jazz band, but plenty of mixing in drumline and some other activities) is not what you describe. Am I just oblivious, or are things maybe continuing to change since you got your information?
11/9/10, 5:15 PM
Jan said…
I do agree with Agibean, though, that if RBHS attempts to increase enrollment by siting a magnet program that draws from heavily OUTSIDE its neighborhood -- it will be hard, at least at first, which is why my assumption is that the RBHS community will be looking for something that improves the school for ITS community. One of the things that I think has helped Garfield over time is that the school is more mixed than it is often described. Not ALL the nonminority kids are APP. Many are just kids from Leschi, Madrona, the CD, Capital Hill, etc. for whom Garfield is their neighborhood school -- and that creates a very different vibe than if there are just two opposing cohorts -- the neighborhood kids (who need "improving") and the imported, out of area cohort brought in to "improve them."
11/9/10, 5:21 PM
Anonymous said…
My daughter graduated from Franklin a year and a half ago, so pretty recent.

We were also told on a tour of Washington Middle School last spring that the kids (many of whom go to Garfield) segregate themselves by program (which are mostly also segregated by race). We heard this from two of the counselors and from several parents already at the school.

Garfield admin has been trying very hard since at least the 1990's to bring more minority kids into the advanced classes. I know one principal deliberately mixed the classes up on the floors so that there wouldn't be a "black floor" and a "white floor" of classes and kids would be more willing to "cross the boundries". But not all the faculty buy into that, and there have long been stories (and I've heard them first-hand) from parents and kids about being discouraged from trying.
11/9/10, 6:03 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more