Debate the issues facing Seattle Public Schools, share your opinions, read the latest news. Organize and work for high quality public schools that educate all students to become passionate, lifelong learners.
What We Don't Measure By Testing (Tell Me Big Data-Where is this Listed?)
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
From the Maria Montessori page:
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Comments
Anonymous said…
It's not measured by testing. That's why there are barely any counselors. Counselors are key to helping all students develop the list of personal strengths on this list.
The children are being robbed of a full education and taxpayers ought to be pissed. I don't think this is what the people of Seattle or Washington State want for our children.
not smiling
Anonymous said…
I would change the title of the list to
"Qualities that Cannot Be Measured"
Or
"Qualities that Cannot Be Taught"
Or
"Qualities that Are Not the Responsibility of Public Schools"
Or
"Qualities that Should Be Instilled in the Home Rather Than School"
Big Data
Anonymous said…
Big Data,
Actually, many of these attributes are part of executive functioning, the frontal part of the brain that has been highly correlated with school and long-term achievement.
Like anything else, if they aren't taught at home, where should they be taught, especially when they have such a strong correlation with outcomes?
The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested. It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio. (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
This may only be a partial list of reasons; please, add anything else in the comments. The deadline to file to run for the Board is May 19th. Entire Board Majority NOT vetting the Superintendent in any way, shape or form. Even the Seattle Times thought that was wrong. It was just absolute hubris and it was wrong. For the second time in just over a year , board members voted to negotiate a superintendent contract during a special meeting with no opportunity for public comment. This time, they showed an even deeper disregard for their responsibilities as public servants: Aborting a national search for a new superintendent and denying Interim Superintendent Brent Jones a chance to show students, parents and taxpayers that, indeed, he is the best person for the job. Government bodies can’t fast-forward through transparent processes just because they think they know the right answer. One other odd thing about the hiring of Brent Jones - most permanent SPS superintendent contracts ar
Update 5 It appears that there is another person running in Director Rankin's district, Michael Christophersen. He has run before. From past interactions when he was running before, he's not school board material in the least and he comes off as creepy. (The King County Elections listing is unclear; he's on there as both running and withdrawing.) If he stays in the race, it will mean a primary for that district. That could be interesting because then you would see if Rankin - after pretty much ignoring Ingraham High parents as well as Broadview-Thomson parents and their safety concerns - truly has support in her own district. As well, there is another contender in District 6 and she's Maryanne Wood. Ms Wood's LinkedIn page says she is a "shift lead" at Kinetic Builders but there are no dates for her employment. The company is a general contracting company. I can't find much more about her. end of update Update 4 - To make it clear: District 1 (Ranki
Comments
The children are being robbed of a full education and taxpayers ought to be pissed. I don't think this is what the people of Seattle or Washington State want for our children.
not smiling
"Qualities that Cannot Be Measured"
Or
"Qualities that Cannot Be Taught"
Or
"Qualities that Are Not the Responsibility of Public Schools"
Or
"Qualities that Should Be Instilled in the Home Rather Than School"
Big Data
Actually, many of these attributes are part of executive functioning, the frontal part of the brain that has been highly correlated with school and long-term achievement.
Like anything else, if they aren't taught at home, where should they be taught, especially when they have such a strong correlation with outcomes?
Look up the Marshmallow Test as an example.
--enough already