Should Principals Tell Staff about Sex Offenders at Schools?
One story the Times
did cover was that the state Supreme Court said a 14-year old Bethel
High school girl who was raped - off-campus - by another student, who
was an older registered sex offender, can sue that district. The older
student had been "acting an an unofficial coach and mentor to younger
students." The school knew his background but did not tell staff. It
was a 5-4 decision.
Update: The Everett Herald is reporting that this ruling by the Supreme Court sends it back to a jury to decide on whether the district was negligent towards this student.
Other items on this subject to note from Stop Sexual Assault in Schools.org
- In July, the Seattle School District's violations that led to the opening of the 2014 TItle IX investigation was featured in a US congressional briefing today. The case was presented by the Neena Chaudhry of the National Women's Law Center alongside other members of the National Coalition of Women and Girls in Education such as the AAUW.
- SSAIS.org is launching a free Title IX video for families in the fall. I'll bring you details when it is available.
- Interview with the head of Stop Sexual Assault in Schools.org, Ester Warkov in We News.
The Pierce County Sheriff’s Office notified the high school’s principal, but the principal did not inform other faculty and did not develop a safety plan that would have helped Clark avoid students two or more years younger than him as required, according to the suit.I would agree that everyone has a right to privacy but you have to wonder if the staff had known this guy's background if he would have been allowed to be a track practice with young girls, interacting with them.
Quoting a ruling by the Idaho Supreme Court, González noted “the relevant inquiry is to the location of the negligence rather than the location of the injury.”
In the dissent, Madsen noted, too, that students — even registered sex offenders — have a legal right to privacy in their schools.
Update: The Everett Herald is reporting that this ruling by the Supreme Court sends it back to a jury to decide on whether the district was negligent towards this student.
Other items on this subject to note from Stop Sexual Assault in Schools.org
- In July, the Seattle School District's violations that led to the opening of the 2014 TItle IX investigation was featured in a US congressional briefing today. The case was presented by the Neena Chaudhry of the National Women's Law Center alongside other members of the National Coalition of Women and Girls in Education such as the AAUW.
- SSAIS.org is launching a free Title IX video for families in the fall. I'll bring you details when it is available.
- Interview with the head of Stop Sexual Assault in Schools.org, Ester Warkov in We News.
The Teach Safe Relationships Act, originally introduced as a stand-alone bill co-sponsored by Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine of Virginia and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, directs federal grant money to public schools for instruction and training in age-appropriate "safe relationship behavior."- Really good article from EdSource:
Currently only 20 states and the District of Columbia require that students learn skills to "avoid coercion" as part of their sex education programs, and only 22 states require that sex education be taught at all, according to a November report by the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based research group. The Teach Safe Relationships Act of the pending ESSA would not necessarily be tied to sex education curriculum.
In October, California became the first state to approve a high school sexual-assault-prevention law based on an "affirmative consent" or a "yes means yes" standard for sex, similar to the state's 2014 college "affirmative consent" sexual assault legislation. California's high school law, which takes effect in January, will require all public high schools to develop curriculum that addresses sexual violence prevention and healthy peer relationships based on the affirmative consent standard.
The findings do not imply that bullying leads to rape, according to a research brief on Espelage’s work published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Instead, the findings suggest the need for schools to explicitly address and forbid homophobic teasing and sexual harassment, the authors said.
“Unlike flirting or good-natured joking, which are mutual interactions between two people, sexual harassment is unwelcomed and unwanted behavior which may cause the target to feel threatened, afraid, humiliated, angry, or trapped,” according to the National Women’s Law Center’s primer on sexual harassment for students. In the school environment, sexual harassment includes unwanted sexual behavior – such as sending sexual notes, grabbing body parts, spreading sexual rumors or making sexual gestures, jokes, or verbal comments – that interferes with a student’s opportunity to obtain an education, according to the law center. Sexual harassment may occur electronically or in person.
It is also against the law in federally funded schools under Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, as reiterated in a 2011 “Dear Colleague” letter from the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.
Comments
The Supreme Court didn't say that the school district was negligent, they only ruled that the case to determine the district's negligence could go forward.
sped parent
I can support your assessment; 1:1's are "restrictive" when cost-cutting admin proclaim they are. But the same admin are more than willing to gamble on a sex offender, given the pretense of the perpetrator's "privacy" or whatever fallacious argument of the day.
I'd love to hear the rationale admin provide, along with the federal laws that they use as CYA.
I also want aggrieved families of both the disabled and the sexually-abused to sue the district until they reform their practices. Not until then will they quit sacrificing children to expediency and smokescreens.