Walking Schools Buses - One School's Plan

This article is from the Queen Anne News. From the article:

"Lawton Walking School Buses, a program initiated this past spring, start up again with the resumption of school and will be "running" every Walking Wednesday and Fuel Free Friday throughout the school year.

The idea is that Lawton Elementary School families should consider this safe and health-enhancing alternative to driving to school. On each of the five routes (see below), students start out with a trained safety volunteer in the lead. All buses depart at 8:30 a.m., with an intermediate pickup point along the way."

Sounds like a good starting point.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm interested about how this is funded. My child's elementary school made a huge deal about bus count week, with the PTA encouraging even non-riders to get in the bus that week to up the counts for state funding.

Is this program funded by the state. I think it would be great if it were.
10/7/07, 11:12 PM
Anonymous said…
There is federal money available through Safe Routes to Schools; however, I don't know how those funds are distributed - i.e. to individual schools vs. to regional coordinators. You could contact Feet First (http://www.feetfirst.info/), the Seattle pedestrian organization that has spearheaded walking school bus programs in several SW Seattle and South Seattle schools.

There's also a strong walking school bus program at Laurelhurst, with a volunteer mom who does presentations on how the program is sustained. Feet First could connect people to her.

I've never heard about bus counts being tied to school funding - what is that?
10/8/07, 9:52 AM
Anonymous said…
Sorry, not school funding, just transportation funding. The way it was described to me, about 60% of transportation costs are covered by the state. This is determined by the survey week. Therefore the more kids who ride the bus that week, the more money the district gets for bussing costs from the state. This frees up district money for other programs.
10/8/07, 1:26 PM
Anonymous said…
There is no funding for walking school buses at Lawton. Just a few parent volunteers, some safety vests bought by the PTA and lots of encouragement.
12/8/07, 1:43 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more