Just Asking

I normally wouldn't do this but here's a 45-second video of a little girl (4 or 5) explaining what she does and doesn't want out of life. I saw this at The Slog.

I'm asking what you think because of the mixed reactions it got from their readers. Is it charming? Alarming? Does she have parents who care or parents with issues?

I'll hold my thoughts back until I hear from our readers so just asking...what do you think?

Comments

Sharmour said…
I just watched a little girl who listens to her parents (probably mom) and thinks deeply about relationships. I know my 6 year old has already formed profound opinions about her future life, I am glad for it, because even if she does not follow these early goals, they will have a lasting impression on her future life.

I didn't read the responses to the video, but why not strive for career before marriage. It would be a safety net for so many different life circumstances.
2/22/11, 4:26 PM
SolvayGirl said…
Who knows how the idea got put in her head, or why she felt compelled to state it so emphatically on camera. It could be anything from, as Sachi said, listening to her parents discuss financial issues or her own intelligence making a wise assumption after watching any of the Real Housewives shows (kidding).

But I agree with Sachi. I think it would be wise for BOTH parties to "have a job" and try to "do something special" before contemplating marriage.

I also did not read the Slog comments...
2/22/11, 4:31 PM
seattle citizen said…
hmm...I admire her emphatic belief. I wonder if it's a bit exclusive: I WON'T marry (fall in love, cohabitate, partner...the varying degrees of "marry") until I have a job (and a special one, at that). Admirable and wise, but is there room for "wuv, twoo wuv," to quote Princess Bride)if the focus is ONLY on "job first"?

Strangely, and call me on it if this is abstract, it reminds me somewhat of "everybody ready for college and work." Where's the LOVE?

That said, this girl's adamant insistence to have a special job before marrying does remind us of the perils of the not-so-distant past, where, in many if not most instances, a woman's economic life was tied somehow to a man's.

I just hope this girl (and likewise little boys) stay open to love, too. Maybe it'll hit the second year of college...
2/22/11, 4:49 PM
anonymous said…
I think this is a 5 year olds take on what her mother and father probably told her about the importance of being independent and the being able to support and take care of herself. The importance of finishing school and establishing herself in the world before getting settling down and getting married.
2/22/11, 5:04 PM
seattle citizen said…
Yep, Guppy, mainly I agree. Pretty positive! And I'm sure if love strikes somewhere along the way, being independentely minded she'll do well in that department, too, regardless if she's got a job by then or not! "Yes, I'll marry you, but I might end up in Rio for work when I graduate, so keep your bags packed to come with me!"
2/22/11, 5:21 PM
Chris S. said…
I noticed the comment underneath the video which implies the video was the creation of an older sibling. Never underestimate the influence of an older sibling...(Here's hoping a viral video never comes out of my family!)

I'm having the interesting thought that we often feel like we can take a more active role in choosing a career than in choosing a relationship. Is this just women? Or just pre-puberty? Even when I was five, back in the dark ages, I never said "I want to get married" when someone said what did I want to be when I grew up.

Now I'll have to go see what the sloggers said...
2/22/11, 7:27 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
I thought she was charming. Maybe she has a single mom who has told her to believe in herself first.

Several commenters at the Slog seemed to think she was a little piece of work. My comment was would it have been better if she was in a princess costume saying she was waiting for Prince Charming?
2/22/11, 7:48 PM
SC Parent said…
I'd be curious what the kids are talking about at her school/day care. I wonder if some enterprising boy has been bugging her to marry him :)
2/26/11, 3:19 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more