Community Meeting Open Thread

If you attend either the Martin-Morris or Smith-Blum community meetings, let us know what you hear.

I suspect Kay will get an earful.  The issue at Lowell is NOT just a personnel matter; parents need to know that their children will be protected and inappropriate conduct investigated.

It's a public trust between parents and schools and it needs to be protected.

Comments

dan dempsey said…
KSB should get an earful.

Jack Whelan pointed out that KSB is all about trusting principals ...... so how about evaluating principals.

Who writes letters of reprimand for school board members? Can the Ombudsman do that?

Has the Board written a letter of reprimand to Dr. Enfield? ((I guess only the State Auditor's office can do that if the Board cares to be clueless .... see Board and MGJ))

Isn't it about time for Dr. Enfield to review Martin Floe's progress?

=========

In the wake of cheating scandals on testing in various parts of the nation, I wonder how hard it is to cheat on attendance and pick up a school attendance award? .... from the "how to remain a principal in the SPS" strategy collection.
3/24/12, 12:48 PM
Parent said…
At the meeting with Kay Smith-Blum, the investigative report was not discussed (neither Smith-Blum nor the Lowell parents present brought it up). The main topic of discussion was the upcoming BEX IV levy.
3/25/12, 9:44 PM
RosieReader said…
Dan, why would you possibly want Enfield to review Floe? What good could that possibly do? Martin has told the school that he has worked closely and well this year with his Director, and he is no longer under any sort of extra supervision -- he's being evaluated as any principal would/should be evaluated.

Please don't try to re-open any cans of worms. Things are going very well at Ingraham these days, and we need to keep looking forward, not back.
3/26/12, 4:14 PM
Anonymous said…
http://www.infinitiplanet.com/blog/49510
8/20/12, 8:57 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more