Farewell to Pinehurst K-8?

Superintendent Banda has sent a letter to Pinehurst families about their school that leaves things pretty up in the air but on a downward trend. 

He tells the families that they had been considering moving Pinehurst to Broadview-Thomson K-8 but that it will NOT happen.  Pinehurst will stay where it is for one more year and they will have "discussions over the summer about the school's future beyond the 2013-2014 school year."

District, just pull the band aid off.  It might be kinder.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Very sad. There were several kids there who started in Waldorf but couldn't afford the tuition even with support. I wonder what they will do. I wonder if they will start looking at forming a charter school.

HP
6/14/13, 11:19 AM
Po3 said…
I did not vote for charter schools because I don't like the companies like KIPP that run them. But I would support Pinehurst going charter as it is the kind of school I think charters were intended to be.
6/14/13, 12:30 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
HP/Po3, not going to happen.

Not because the people at Pinehurst don't have a worthy program or care enough. But the way this chartering is being set up, you have to be extremely in the know or else have experience in applying AND being ready to explain your application AND having the resources to get this done.

I really think very few grassroots group will have that ability.
6/14/13, 3:10 PM
Doh Driver said…
But Melissa, if they pull the band-aid off *before* they close the school, then we could claim they aren't following the process and take them to court. Better to string us along on false hopes. Or rather, poison us in small measures and cross their fingers that we don't notice what they're doing.
6/15/13, 12:08 AM
kgroth said…
I don't think the District gets or supports alternative education since they frequently threaten to close Pinehurst K-8, our enrollment drops, and then we're faulted for low enrollment and threatened again. Our school would probably be better as a Charter school or an independent school (not in SPS). The challenge is we would need a corporation with the business expertise to submit the Charter school application, it's too complicated for a group of volunteer parents. I have an accounting degree and business background and it would be a stretch for me and a full-time job to fill out the lengthy, cumbersome application.

I question how genuine was the District proposal to co-locate with Broadview-Thomson since they never shared details of the feasibility with us like they did with schools in a similar situation such as Jane Addams K-8. We were told the proposal was a 99% "done deal". Then the Broadview-Thomson PTA protested it a week ago (since the District never informed the PTA of it and asked us not to contact them), and a week later we got a memo from Banda that Broadview-Thomson was off the table, without any details or explanation. That shows that large schools with a loud voice can protest something and the District will bow down to them. Goliath won this one, and small schools in Seattle are a dying breed.

Pinehurst's future looks doubtful so I transferred my 1st grader to Sacajawea, our attendance school, and one of the last small schools in Seattle with 250 students K-5. If I wait another year after boundaries change, my child could be assigned to Olympic Hills which is walking distance from us, and they are scheduled to become a large school in their new building. No thanks, I prefer small schools.
6/15/13, 11:51 AM
Anonymous said…
I really couldn't see how they would fit the Pinehurst program at Broadview-Thompson's site. It is a former junior high building that doesn't have a large footprint. The playground has been created out of old parking lot space. So, the existing playground would be the only place to put portables. I suppose the kids could use the park next door instead of the school's playground? That's the only way I think the district could have made it work. And, what happens as B-T gets more full like all the north end schools? How do they split the gym and library time then? What are the odds those portables would end up taken over by the neighborhood program eventually?

Pinehurst deserves a real building, not a collection of portables in a parking lot and part-time access to the "real school." They also don't deserve to be kicked out of their current building and to be threatened with closure over and over. I feel awful for them.

Incoming Parent
6/18/13, 1:15 PM
Unknown said…
Hi
I don't know if this is the right blog. But these codes from tonight's meeting might help us. They haven't been revised since 08' but we might be able to use them? But they also lead back to some really random codes.
9/10/13, 9:08 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more