Debate the issues facing Seattle Public Schools, share your opinions, read the latest news. Organize and work for high quality public schools that educate all students to become passionate, lifelong learners.
Seattle Schools Strategic Plan Motto
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Every Student.
Every Classroom.
Every Day.
Three Goals, 50,000 Journeys.
What do you think?
I'm good with this. I just would like to see the entire plan more streamlined and focused as the motto.
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Comments
Anonymous said…
I saw it on some printed SPS materials recently and I actually really like this. A lot. And agree with it too. It's about the journey, not the destination.
-katy.did
Jon said…
I like it too. Every child matters. The public in public education.
Anonymous said…
Looks like the Tacoma school district's with an extra two lines added.
-SWED
Anonymous said…
Hmm. Not sure how the district can support class size increases if this is the new motto. -Gretchen
Anonymous said…
Yes, it sounds nice. But what exactly are those three goals???
Huh? There aren't any verbs. What does this even mean? What goals? I kind of like 50,000 journeys, but the rest is completely free of content. It can mean whatever the reader wants it to mean.
Anonymous said…
Bravo, the reign of terror is officially over. We have just exited the worst 5 years in SPS history. The past administration set SPS on a negative course, there are still some bad performers (T and L), but nothing is worse than a supt. that hated teaching/teachers. Goodbye old motto!
Is there anything we could do to stop the individualization of programs? The good ole' days meant going to school with your neighbors. Let's return to neighborhood schools, even for the APP students. Smart is one thing, but gifted is another.
I think the best mission statement would be to have none. If you need to state the mission of your organization that means that people need a reference to know it, which means that it isn't really the mission of your organization. The mission of an organization should be unmistakable to any participant or observer.
I wonder how much Strategies360 got paid for that. I'm guessing $5K per word.
Anonymous said…
Once upon a time, I was sitting in a staff meeting with the rest of the teachers, listening to the "highly paid consultant" someone had hired to motivate us, when we heard the eight words that strike terror into the hearts of people everywhere:
"We need to look at your mission statement."
At the next break I went to my classroom, fired up my computer, and went to the Dilbert.com random mission statement generator.
I wrote down the output, replacing the word "business" with the word "education" and took it back to the whole staff.
They loved it so much that after some minor wordsmithing, it's what they eventually adopted.
The big joke was that I was the only one in the building who knew the truth that in the tradition of Jerry Seinfeld, it was "a mission statement about nothing".
The moral of the story:
Don't confuse a mission statement with hard work or productivity. Our staff was extraordinarily hard working and productive and our students learned a tremendous amount while in our care. The change from the old mission statement to the new mission statement had zero effect on that level of effort or that level of productivity.
Neither will this mission statement at the district level
The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested. It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio. (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read). end of update Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board. To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up. But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting. In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance. - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Comments
-katy.did
-SWED
-Gretchen
HIMSmom
It sounds like merely an attendance mandate. I'd like to see sort of goal(s) attached:
"every inspiration" or
"every inquiry" or
"every dream"
That one always gave me the picture of a minder with a whip thrashing the minions of students and staff alike.
There was also the problem that not all students were achieving and not all staff was accountable.
Onward.
DistrictWatcher
reader
Is there anything we could do to stop the individualization of programs? The good ole' days meant going to school with your neighbors. Let's return to neighborhood schools, even for the APP students. Smart is one thing, but gifted is another.
Teacher
"We need to look at your mission statement."
At the next break I went to my classroom, fired up my computer, and went to the Dilbert.com random mission statement generator.
I wrote down the output, replacing the word "business" with the word "education" and took it back to the whole staff.
They loved it so much that after some minor wordsmithing, it's what they eventually adopted.
The big joke was that I was the only one in the building who knew the truth that in the tradition of Jerry Seinfeld, it was "a mission statement about nothing".
The moral of the story:
Don't confuse a mission statement with hard work or productivity. Our staff was extraordinarily hard working and productive and our students learned a tremendous amount while in our care. The change from the old mission statement to the new mission statement had zero effect on that level of effort or that level of productivity.
Neither will this mission statement at the district level
Ex-SPS
"Let's return to neighborhood schools, even for the APP students."
Okay, teacher, explain to us how ALL students, even APP students, will be served at their neighborhood schools.
S parent
My entry would be:
Students, staff and teachers
Working as one to create a better world
For the whole world