What about Recess?

Garfield teacher and activist Jesse Hagopian weighs in on the issue of the benefits of recess in an op-ed at the Times.

The average time Seattle students spend in recess has steadily declined over the past few years according to a May KUOW investigative story.

 What's worse, the schools with the shortest recess times enroll disproportionately more low-income students and students of color.

I'll just weigh in and say I believe it is folly to cut unstructured play for students.  I think many of you might be too young to remember the children's singer, Raffi, but he had a great song called "Shake My Sillies Out."  I think recess is a good time for that and gives a needed outlet for kids and benefits the teacher with kids who more prepared to learn.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I know many middle school kids don't take PE classes because they have to take reading or math improvement classes. As a result, they are spending most of their time in the classrooms (about 5 hours a day)with little time to exercise or socialize with friends (mostly during lunchtime). While these students, a lot of them are kids with behavior issues, do need to improve their academic skills, it's more important for their well being that they get a chance to exercise every day. 5 hours a day in the classrooms is just too much!

KT
10/5/14, 11:35 PM
Anonymous said…
Time for lunch and recess was cut at Whittier this year by 10 minutes total (was 20 min and 20 min, now is 15 min and 15 min). There is an afternoon recess of about 15 min. This cut was stated to be because of the state requirement for 1000 hours of school time per year (when I looked it appeared to be this law: RCW 28A.150.220). However, this law seems to count recess as instructional hours, and to my knowledge when it was discussed with the principal, this cut in lunch/recess was to help "earn" us these hours. I also remember discussion by the principal of eventually trying to get up to 1080 hours by having to get rid of early release days, which doesn't seem to make much sense because I didn't see anything about K-5 needing 1080 hours, and there is also information there that early release days are counted as school hours.

I also find it interesting that there is a law (RCW 28A.405.460) that "provides that all certificated employees shall be allowed reasonable lunch period of not less than thirty continuous minutes during the regular school lunch periods" when the students are getting 15 minutes.

Whittier parent
10/6/14, 12:13 AM
Unknown said…
Are the comments really disabled on that piece or is it just me?

Maureen
10/6/14, 8:55 AM
Catherine said…
@Maureen... they just finally were enabled... I've been whining at the times for three days...
10/6/14, 10:53 AM
Anonymous said…
I think many elemrntaries in Seattle are futzing with their schedules this year as a result of newer hours requirements from the state. What we really need is that half hour back we lost in the 70's, which all the other districts have. Then we could add back recess and lunch time and still meet hours requirements.

-sleeper
10/6/14, 11:52 AM
Anonymous said…
@ Whittier Parent:
Few teachers get 30 minutes for lunch. Yes, it is on the books but rarely does a 30-min lunch become a reality. At least at elementary. At my school, the staff room was actually given over to a instr. asst. who needed a place to work.

retired teacher
10/8/14, 12:09 AM
Anonymous said…
I wasn't saying that teachers necessarily get 30 min for lunch. I just found it interesting that that was the law. And that it seems to be ok for students to get 15. And I don't count it as a half hour when it's 15 for lunch and 15 for recess, as my child can't eat during recess. And this 15 min also counts waiting in line, socializing (which they want to do since they're supposed to be limiting that in class) and walking to the lunchroom.

I also don't think it's reasonable for K-8 to increase their total school hours over 1000 to help out with the grades 9-12 "needing" 1080 hours. There's a reason for more hours when their older and less when they're younger!

Whittier parent
10/8/14, 9:50 AM
Jana said…
oh, and I meant to also add that I just found out from my son that there are some weeks he has P.E. only once (possibly 30 minutes) and at best twice (60 minutes). This is far off the mark of the required PE time mandated by the state. I believe it is 100 minutes a week (maybe 90).
10/10/14, 12:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more