Charter School Initiative will cost $3 Million

Here is the estimate from the Office of Financial Management

Comments

Kathy said…
Charter advocates have promoted false claims that charter schools will not take dollars from public schools. Statements such as "Dollars follow the students." is an over-simplification of funding processes.

This document affirms our assertions that charter schools will take dollars from our already under-funded public schools. Thus, putting more students at risk.

From the document:

"fiscal impact to school districts is indeterminant, but non-zero."
8/11/12, 10:18 AM
Anonymous said…
The use of levy funds seems like another black hole in the discussion. Something that's never talked about by the pro-charter school crowd. I'm already bothered that our public funds will possibly be given to for-profit managers of 'public' charters, but then to see my local levy funds be given away, too? Especially when those funds are desperately needed to meet the unfunded mandates of the state.

K
8/11/12, 1:02 PM
Anonymous said…
WAPTSA opposes this charter school initiative.
http://wsptagrassroots.blogspot.com/2012/08/wspta-opposes-charter-school-initiative.html

signed,
pleased ptsa parent
8/11/12, 1:21 PM
Bureaucracy Costs said…
Estimates for charter schools is $3M. However, like all bureaucratic etntities, I"d expect this number to grow.
8/12/12, 9:34 AM
Charlie Mas said…
Bureaucracy Costs wrote: "Estimates for charter schools is $3M."

That's the sum of the costs that they could estimate. There are a lot of additional costs that the OFM acknowledged would be there, but they couldn't estimate.
8/12/12, 11:07 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more