This may only be a partial list of reasons; please, add anything else in the comments. The deadline to file to run for the Board is May 19th. Entire Board Majority NOT vetting the Superintendent in any way, shape or form. Even the Seattle Times thought that was wrong. It was just absolute hubris and it was wrong. For the second time in just over a year , board members voted to negotiate a superintendent contract during a special meeting with no opportunity for public comment. This time, they showed an even deeper disregard for their responsibilities as public servants: Aborting a national search for a new superintendent and denying Interim Superintendent Brent Jones a chance to show students, parents and taxpayers that, indeed, he is the best person for the job. Government bodies can’t fast-forward through transparent processes just because they think they know the right answer. One other odd thing about the hiring of Brent Jones - most permanent SPS superintendent contracts ar
Comments
-curious
HP
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/67641961/244786140-October-2014-Enrollment-Seattle-Public-Schools.xlsx
--wondering
- North-end Mom
Purple and White
I can't speak for Meg, but maybe the data came from the OSPI report cards?
Total RS 736
College Only 243
RS Voc FTE 25.56
RS NonVoc FTE 481.14
Total FTE - 509 students.
Approximately 1/3 of RS students are full time at the community college and the remaining 2/3s are part time.