Seattle Schools and 1B

From Seattle Schools:

Seattle Public Schools celebrates with the City of Seattle and says a resounding thank you to Seattle voters for their approval of the pre-school initiative. 
Our utmost appreciation for the leadership by the Mayor and the City Council in supporting this important work. 
Providing an early start to our neediest families is one of the most cost effective ways to help EVERY student succeed. 
The city initiative starts small and builds to 2000 students over the next four years. 
We look forward to working with the City of Seattle in the implementation of this important work.  

Naturally, we all think preschool is a good thing.  But really?  All the schools are excited about this work as they are underfunded and overenrolled?  Hard to believe but I'm going with headquarters staff is happy.   (I also note that the second sentence lacks a verb.)

 The district is also WRONG in the "neediest families" statement.  1B does not favor any group of children and consistently said it is open to all.

Most telling?  "We look forward to working" with the City.  So the partnership that IS the linchpin to 1B is a foregone conclusion?

That will be an interesting discussion because until McCleary is fully enacted AND our schools not busting at the seams, I would think the district's involvement would be small. 

As well, the district now has the mandate that is 1351. 

Comments

BS Tim said…
I received an e-mail from Tim Burgess. He thanked voters for choosing the city's prek plan.

Here is what he had to say:

"....nor does it require any space from the Seattle School District."

If his lips are moving...he is lying.
11/9/14, 6:34 PM
Catherine said…
I suspect SSD is going to be the leasee and operator (even if in name only), this gets around a whole bunch of costly, long delayed for inspection, state regs that other childcares are required to adhere to.
11/9/14, 11:05 PM
Anonymous said…
The Achilles heal of Seattlites is the belief that perfection can be achieved through compromise and that every person at the table can walk away with a win. Burgess personifies that attitude in spades. The idea that everyone wins is childish and naive. There has to be trade-offs to get things done. Unless Burgess is really, really dumb, he isn't being forthright here. And I don't think he's dumb.

Time to pin him down on this.

WSDWG
11/10/14, 2:20 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more