More on Teach For America
Just as spring heralds the arrival of new growth, it is sometimes difficult to tell the flowers from the weeds (and to figure out how some things just keep growing).
As previously announced, the money for the TFA recruit fees ($4k per teacher per year for SPS and $3k per teacher per year for Federal Way) will come from a grant from the Washington STEM organization. This would be okay except in trying to figure out how this large grant ($475k) brings more math and science to either district, it gets murky.
At the Washington STEM website, the media kit on the grants explains they will "over-recruit" for TFA recruits with a math or science degree. I asked what this meant and couldn't quite get an answer. (They don't have their own PR people and the question got farmed out to their PR person.) As per TFA, I eventually had to go through the TFA regional person, Janis Ortega. (This happens a great deal of the time. Try to contact a former TFAer and you'll suddenly find yourself with an e-mail from her. Weird.)
Here was my basic question:
Is TFA saying they guarantee that SPS will be getting TFA recruits who had a math or science major based on this STEM grant?
Here's Ms. Ortega's reply: Thanks for reaching out. To answer your question, we typically can’t guarantee an exact number of math/science corps members we’d bring to a particular school district. At this point, we have been able to forecast that at least 10 of our incoming Seattle-Tacoma corps members could be placed as math and science teachers, based on numbers of Teach For America candidates with math and science degrees who have indicated the Puget Sound as their preferred placement region.
I believe that the number of TFA recruits they hoped to bring to the Puget Sound area was about 25. So out of those 25, 10 have math/science degree. Let's say 7 of them pick/get assigned our area. Let's say Federal Way gets 3 and SPS gets 4.
The Washington STEM group thought it this important to get (maybe) 7+ TFA recruits with a math/science degree. They gave one of their biggest grants for this few recruits. I wrote to the head of the Washington STEM organization and the Chair of the Board of Directors to ask them about this issue. No comment yet.
Meanwhile, as I posted from Michael's meeting, Cleveland, the one and only STEM-based school in SPS, is struggling with funding for science materials to the point where the science teachers will give up funding for a department head and divvy that work up among themselves so they can buy science materials.
You have wonder why TFA is getting so much push for what appears to be so little.
As previously announced, the money for the TFA recruit fees ($4k per teacher per year for SPS and $3k per teacher per year for Federal Way) will come from a grant from the Washington STEM organization. This would be okay except in trying to figure out how this large grant ($475k) brings more math and science to either district, it gets murky.
At the Washington STEM website, the media kit on the grants explains they will "over-recruit" for TFA recruits with a math or science degree. I asked what this meant and couldn't quite get an answer. (They don't have their own PR people and the question got farmed out to their PR person.) As per TFA, I eventually had to go through the TFA regional person, Janis Ortega. (This happens a great deal of the time. Try to contact a former TFAer and you'll suddenly find yourself with an e-mail from her. Weird.)
Here was my basic question:
Is TFA saying they guarantee that SPS will be getting TFA recruits who had a math or science major based on this STEM grant?
Here's Ms. Ortega's reply: Thanks for reaching out. To answer your question, we typically can’t guarantee an exact number of math/science corps members we’d bring to a particular school district. At this point, we have been able to forecast that at least 10 of our incoming Seattle-Tacoma corps members could be placed as math and science teachers, based on numbers of Teach For America candidates with math and science degrees who have indicated the Puget Sound as their preferred placement region.
I believe that the number of TFA recruits they hoped to bring to the Puget Sound area was about 25. So out of those 25, 10 have math/science degree. Let's say 7 of them pick/get assigned our area. Let's say Federal Way gets 3 and SPS gets 4.
The Washington STEM group thought it this important to get (maybe) 7+ TFA recruits with a math/science degree. They gave one of their biggest grants for this few recruits. I wrote to the head of the Washington STEM organization and the Chair of the Board of Directors to ask them about this issue. No comment yet.
Meanwhile, as I posted from Michael's meeting, Cleveland, the one and only STEM-based school in SPS, is struggling with funding for science materials to the point where the science teachers will give up funding for a department head and divvy that work up among themselves so they can buy science materials.
You have wonder why TFA is getting so much push for what appears to be so little.
Comments
The Ballard biotech program had private backing, didn't it? You would think the same kind of thing could happen for the STEM program at Cleveland -- and according to Charlie it was supposed to attract private funding and hasn't yet.
Helen Schinske
It's just painful.
Does anyone know -- is there NO current interest by private parties? Are there some (one, two, many) interested but the process is just going slowly?
I know from researching the Delta High STEM program over in the Tri-Cities that they did A LOT of work with education entities and private companies before it was launched.
The "partnerships" page at the Cleveland website has:
- Seattle Bio-Medical Research Institute
-Manufacturing Industrial Council of Seattle
-South Seattle CC
- IGNITE - a program for young woman interested in technology careers
We are an urban city with much to offer in technology and sciences. That the above list is the best we can do for a STEM program is puzzling. I'm sure plenty of people are interested but the district has to go to them (not the other way around). I know that the Computer Science and Engineering Dept. at UW would partner with them in some way but have never been asked.
I frankly think SPS doesn't know what it takes, doesn't know what it's doing and the school may suffer for it.
"I would look at the kinds of things that got the Ballard biotech academy off to a reasonable start.
"http://www.fhcrc.org/about/pubs/center_news/2001/feb15/sart5.html
" "The Biotechnology Career Academy at Ballard High School was initially funded by a grant from the Immunex Corporation to start a science program for high school students.
" "Further funding from the Career Academy Support Network allows academy teachers to work as a team to coordinate an integrated curriculum of science, math and English centered around the theme of biotechnology."
"I would also note that principal Chinn first started talking about Ballard becoming a STEM school about 1990 -- it was a decade or so before that really materialized (and of course the biotech thing was different than the STE focus he originally talked about), and there was a big boost because the new building and the biotech stuff all came at the same time, after a lot of very public fundraising. Even though Cleveland HAS a new building, the excitement for the new building isn't there."
Helen Schinske
"Meanwhile, as I posted from Michael's meeting, Cleveland, the one and only STEM-based school in SPS, is struggling with funding for science materials to the point where the science teachers will give up funding for a department head and divvy that work up among themselves so they can buy science materials."
When only four Directors voted for STEM at Cleveland Via the $800,000 contract with NTN, it was completely apparent that the funding on which moving forward depended was NOT in place.
Once again the "Fab Four" acted without following the previous agreed upon commitments.
The funding as Meg Diaz pointed out has been a chaotic mess.
You can read more about the STEM fraud and forgery here.
Where does Washington STEM get its money?
I'll reiterate that the SEA rep (award winning teacher) at my child's school said some weeks ago that building leaders are being "urged" to get "fresh meat". Now my child's school is not Title 1, why would any administrators be pushing this I don't know. Lora is our regional Ed Director.
In the interest of blaming teachers and doing it well, you need to get rid of teachers who have the audacity to call you out on what you're doing.
How to replace those pesky math and science teachers with hard to find math and science degrees?
How to replace them and make sure the replacements are not around long enough to start to wonder and to start to ask questions?
3 years ago I would have laughed at such Triple Thick Tin-foil Hattery.
Ed Deformers actions have a lot in common with the actions of the reagan-cheney white houses - expect the venal, and they'll always find away to do better at being venal than you'd expect!
Triple Thick Tin Foil
(p.s. of course, you'd need a compliant SEA pushing last minute back door deals with the district for this to really happen ... )
Here's some information about the SEA that I didn't know until recently, passed onto me. The following is all pasted from another source:
Teacher Union Reform Network set up in 1996 to get unions on board with the big business reform agenda. Under SEA President Verletta Wooten, our union became a charter member and financial supporter. Both the NEA and AFT national presidents now belong as well. (Note: The executive director of SEA at that time, Roger Erskine, later became a founding Board member, and is a current Director, for the anti-union, League of Education Voters.)
TURN’s mission is to “affirm the union's responsibility to collaborate with other stakeholders in public education and to seek consistently higher levels of student achievement by: Seeking to expand the scope of collective bargaining to include instructional and professional issues [and] improving continuously the quality of teaching.” Hence, the use of student scores in our evaluations, SEA support for the “coaching model”, MAP, School Improvement Grants, and so forth. (I thought unions were about worker rights, because we professionals could be trusted to look after of our own professional development, silly me.)
According to TURN's website, their “critical friends” include a consultant from Broad Foundation as well as the president of New Schools. The New Schools organization, which raised $145M in the past 10 years from high-profile Reformers including Gates, Broad and Walton, gives financial support to “turnaround” and “charter school management organizations” including KIPP, Green Dot, Teach for America and many other major charter players through its Venture Fund. To follow the money just a bit further, one of the Partners of New School org. (Deb McGriff) sits on the advisory board to Nat’l Council for Teacher Quality, the organization hired by our Alliance For Education to produce the recent “human capital” report for our district with recommendations for merit pay, attacks on seniority, etc.
So just why would our dues go to “reforming” our union in the first place, and why would some of the privatizing Billionaire’s Boys club be our “critical friends” in this transformation? Perhaps we should call on SEA leadership to withdraw their membership in TURN.
Ms. Peggy Allan President
Nat'l State Teachers of the Year
Mr. Albert Bennett
Professor and Director, St. Clair Drake Center- Roosevelt University
Mr. Vince Bertram Superintendent
Evansville Vanderburgh School Corporation
Ms. Gretchen Crosby-Sims
Director of Strategic Initiatives
The Joyce Foundation
Mr. Tim Daly President
The New Teacher Project
Mr. Patrick Dolan
Scholar in Residence - Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs
General Electric Foundation Ohio University
Mr. Matt Gandal
Executive Vice President
Achieve, Inc.
Mr. Dan Goldhaber
Research Professor / Affiliated Scholar / Senior Non-Resident Fellow
Center on Reinventing Public Education at University of Washington / Urban Institute's Education Policy Center / Education Sector
Mr. Paul Goren
Vice President
Spencer Foundation
Ms. Aimee Guidera
Director
Data Quality Campaign
Mr. Bryan Hassel
Co-Director
Public Impact
Ms. Kati Haycock
President
Education Trust
Mr. Paul Herdman
President and CEO
Rodel Foundation
Mr. Paul Hill
John & Marguerite Corbally Professor
University of Washington Director - Center on Reinventing Public Education
Ms. Kelly James
Education Program Officer
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Mr. Alex Johnston
Chief Executive Officer
ConnCAN
Mr. Richard Laine
Director of Education Programs
The Wallace Foundation
Mr. Bruno Manno
Senior Program Associate
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Mr. Gregory McGinity
Senior Director of Policy
The Broad Foundation
Ms. Linda Noonan
Managing Director
Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education
Mr. Mike Petrilli
Vice President for National Programs & Policy
Fordham Foundation
Mr. Andy Plattner
Plattner Communications
Mr. Andrew Rotherham
Co-Founder and Co-Director
Education Sector
Ms. Suzanne Tacheny
Executive Director
Policy Innovators in Education Network
Ms. Jenn Vranek
President
Education First Consulting
Ms. Kate Walsh
President
NCTQ
Mr. Ken Wong
Professor of Education / Chair for Education Policy
Brown University / Urban Education Institute / Annenberg Institute
--seeking point
My point is that SEA leadership is, perhaps, more in bed with the Reformistas than I knew. That they support an organization that is reforming, that this organization has a video of Patrick Dolan on its wesbite, that Patrick Dolan is on this huge "Council" with all these other reformers...
My point is that the web of reformists is wide and intertwined. This council, unknown to me until now, is a veritable who's who of reformers.
No pint besides those, sorry!
I will remind the School Board that they have to sign on the dotted line when they vote to apply for conditional certificates in conformance with the laws of this state.
I think teacher unions serve a logical purpose that helps provide some balance to the heavy-handed approaches of modern management types. Sometimes ambiguous, irrational, or hostile management styles indicate more investigation is needed.
Awesome work!
Now the question is, who funds Washington STEM?
Bill Gates has pretty much gone through our local orgs to push trough his agenda, along with Broad who I think has probably spent their last dollar on Seattle, so my guess is that some big money has just been injected into STEM WA to pay for TFA.
Gates gave STEM WA $10,000,000 (count those zero's now), that's right, $10M this year.
So do you think that bought him just a little influence?
Gates is one of the major proponents of charter schools which hire TFA'ers as cheap, non-union labor.
I know that I am belaboring the point with many of you but it is worth repeating.
Gates is not out of the game yet in Seattle.
See: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Grants-2011/Pages/Washington-STEM-Center-OPP1027355.aspx
I think that the Gates' Foundation has become as useless a bureaucracy as the SPS downtown office.
http://education.washington.edu/areas/ci/profiles/stritikus.html
I dont know if the union(SEA/WEA) is in on it, it being deform (though Randi Weingarten of AFT is) or just plain politically naive (stupid....)...
After conversations with some union leaders this past weekend, I'd say the latter is more likely, at least locally...
glad I didn't get in
Now they will be asserting to OSPI that so and so TFA applicant is the uniquely talented individual for the job, and no fully-certificated teacher is available. If they do this, it is not in compliance with the RCW.