School Budgets Online

Here is a link to the page with the school budgets.

It also has a link to the Weighted Staffing Standards Model.

Comments

Po3 said…
Could this really be true for Nova. Per student allocation is:
1,303,373


And where does one see the funding allocation for laptops at Cleveland?
3/29/11, 1:17 PM
Meg said…
well, first blush looks like the district's talent for projections are as magnificent as ever.

Garfield's enrollment projection is for 1,611 in headcount, 1517 adjusted for contact. Garfield's October (adjusted) enrollment was 1,788. March 2011 enrollment (not adjusted) was 1,784. Does anyone buy that boundary tweaking, accelerated IB and attrition will bleed off that many kids? I don't.
3/29/11, 1:17 PM
zb said…
Does the actual head count instead of AAFT correct the issue we've heard about the staffing allocations for special needs students at K-8's like TOPS?
3/29/11, 2:59 PM
Charlie Mas said…
NOVA isn't on the WSS. The District just pretty much gives NOVA a check and NOVA decides how to allocate it. There are some constraints, but not many.

You'll notice that NOVA has only 8.85 FTE on the budget allocation.

Compare it to The Center School (266 students to NOVA's 305). NOVA has no teachers, no counselor, no attendance specialist, no Visual Arts Assistant.

Compare it to Rainier Beach (402 students). NOVA has no librarian, no assistant principal, no fiscal specialist, no academic intervention specialist, no data registrar specialist, and no activity coordinator.

NOVA can allocate their money pretty much as they like. They put it into teachers.
3/29/11, 3:56 PM
Paul said…
charlie,

Is that $1,392,807.00 for teachers for 305 students at NOVA? $4566.00 per student?

I think that was Po3's question.
3/29/11, 6:18 PM
basically said…
Accelerated IB is only bleeding off about 40 kids, not much of an impact for this year.
3/29/11, 6:44 PM
Maureen said…
zb, YES!!! Now K-8s are allocated 1.0 fulltime teacher for every full class, even if some of the kids have level 2 IEPS! Hooray! (K-8s used to have to buy percentages of teachers with their discretionary funds if there were any kids who needed special ed services enrolled.)

Next thing will be to allow gen ed teachers to actually grade all the kids who are taking their classes instead of pretending like the ones who require Level 4 services spend all day in their self contained classrooms and only allowing that teacher to access their files. (Presumably that will happen as ICS rolls up-but it should be happening now.)
3/29/11, 6:46 PM
Charlie Mas said…
Paul, the way it works is that schools get a certain amount of money through the WSS. At most schools, the bulk of the money also comes with the requirement to fill specific staff positions. That dramatically reduces the amount available for the BLT to determine how to spend for themselves. At NOVA they get the money that they would have received through the WSS but without most of the staffing requirements. Consequently, the amount available for NOVA to decide how to spend is much higher.

The spending per student is equitable; NOVA just gets a lot more discretion about how they spend it. That "per student" allocation is poorly labelled. It should read something like: "money not yet committed to the FTE's shown above".
3/29/11, 7:45 PM
Maureen said…
All of the Alts (or are we calling them Innovation Schools now?)should have the same budget flexibility as Nova. Of course they would have to have principals and staff who could deal with that responsibility.
3/30/11, 9:56 AM
Kathy said…
Looks like elementary school counselors have effectively been elliminated.
3/30/11, 10:42 AM
SeattleSped said…
For those families in Special Education:

"Every Student a General Education student First!" NOT.

The WSS demonstrates that, once again, middle and high school students with special needs only count as a fraction of a kid. They can only plant one cheek on their GenEd seat.
3/30/11, 1:41 PM
Anonymous said…
Maureen, level 3 and 4 special education students in your school will also be funding a general education seat. Will those students in those self-contained programs get to go to general education now? If those self-contained students do not go to general education, to what rightly is their general education classroom, then their dollars will in fact be funding seats for other students and reduced class size for other people.

SPED parent
3/31/11, 5:15 PM
Maureen said…
SPED Parent, I think I understand that, but I can't see where the money goes. We have full gen ed classrooms at every grade level without the level 4 kids (we don't have any identified as level 3), so when the level 4 kids are in the gen ed classroom the class is bigger than the contractual max and sometimes there is no IA or Sped teacher to help them. It seems to me that if they are gen ed students first then the number of gen ed kids in a class should decrease to account for that. (In our case, that would mean a base class size of 27 and then 3 seats for the Level 4 kids, instead of 30 gen ed kids plus 3 more level 4 kids in a class). There also has to be enough money so that the Level 4 kids can have an IA or teacher (or ASL translator) with them in the gen ed class if they need it. Just dropping those kids into a class of 30-33 with no help seems wrong.
3/31/11, 9:16 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Nepotism in Seattle Schools

Update: Following a scandal at Aki Kurose Middle School, apparently the district has pulled the principal, Caine Lowery who leaves Aki for a promotion to Central Office to support/train/guide principals. Hmm. I also note that former Rainier View Elementary principal Anitra Jones, who was removed from that school, still doesn't show up on the staff roster at Rainier Beach High School where it was stated she would be. Where is she? Who knows?  end of update   This is going to be a difficult post to write because it is sad to see what looks like a norm now at JSCEE. The norm I speak of is largely an occurrence with principals as well as JSCEE senior staff. I also know that this is not going to surprise most who works at JSCEE. The norm I'm referring to is the one where some personnel have personal connections within the district that sees them moving between jobs and even getting promoted based on those relationships. In short, nepotism.  This district is risk-adverse wh...
Read more