Correction from OSPI on Special Education Student Scores

In our Aug. 16 press release on statewide test scores, OSPI incorrectly reported some numbers.

 Students receiving special education services can show their proficiency by earning a Level 2 on the Smarter Balanced tests. The original table OSPI posted was inconsistent in showing proficiency across 2015 and 2016. One year included students who passed at a Level 2, while the other did not. For clarity and transparency sake, we offer the following corrected tables:

  1. All students showing proficiency. This includes students who earned a Level 3 or 4 and those students whose Individualized Education Program (IEP) allows them to show proficiency by earning a Level 2.

Percent of students proficient, 2015-16

ELA
Math
Grade
2015
2016
Diff.
2015
2016
Diff.
3
52.1
54.3
2.2
56.7
58.9
2.2
4
54.6
57.0
2.4
54.0
55.4
1.4
5
57.6
60.1
2.5
48.1
49.2
1.1
6
54.0
56.5
2.5
45.5
48.0
2.5
7
56.9
58.5
1.6
48.0
49.8
1.8
8
56.9
59.7
2.8
46.1
47.8
1.7

  1. Students earning Level 3 or 4. This includes only students who scored a Level 3 or 4.

Percent of students proficient, 2015-16

ELA
Math
Grade
2015
2016
Diff.
2015
2016
Diff.
3
51.7
54.0
2.3
56.4
58.7
2.3
4
54.1
56.6
2.5
53.7
55.0
1.3
5
57.1
59.6
2.5
47.7
48.9
1.2
6
53.5
56.0
2.5
45.2
47.8
2.6
7
56.2
57.9
1.7
47.6
49.5
1.9
8
56.4
59.0
2.6
45.8
47.6
1.8

OSPI regrets the error.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This DATA is falsified for SPED. The problem is no one cares and the can gets kicked down the road.

Black Face
8/24/16, 10:07 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Black Face, and how do you know that?
8/24/16, 10:37 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more