Preview of What's Coming at the End of this School Year
I will be better able to flesh this out at the end of the week but I'm hearing some pretty serious rumblings.
It appears one high school principal will lose a job (not just RBHS) and may not be placed elsewhere.
I believe this may be happening as a signal to other principals to get with the curriculum alignment program or else. (So far there doesn't appear to be any other reason like a criminal act or fraud.)
Meaning, less flexibility/creativity in how teachers can teach the curriculum and principals will be expected to bear down on teachers who don't follow the direction of the alignment.
It also appears the district is unwilling to state whether or not they are closing RBHS for a year and then reopening it as a "transformation" school. This would have HUGE repercussions for the entire district as whether or not you think is something that should be done (or should have been done long ago), the question would be - where would those 350 kids go?
Garfield's boundaries are narrowed and Franklin is taking on more students. I think they will be full. Cleveland is an Option school and Sealth should also be full. Are they seriously going to bus kids up to Hale and Ingraham and out to West Seattle where there is space?
Update: the principal in question is Martin Floe at Ingraham. Dr. Enfield sent a letter to parents today telling them this news. (The letter does not make it clear if Principal Floe will continue on within SPS.) Neither parents, nor staff, nor students were allowed to give input before the decision was made.
I'm hearing that the district wanted someone else in there who has experience with IB AND international schools. It's handy that they have such a person in Margit Moore, an assistant principal at Garfield (hey, she also has experience with APP students), who was a teacher at Bellevue's International School and coordinated the IB program there.
The parents and staff are being assure that the district will "work with you to collect desired attributes and qualifications for the next principal." A friend of mine said, "We'll just say, 'We want another Martin Floe'." The district is interviewing soon and are hoping to name a new principal before the end of the school year. That's a pretty speedy timeframe. I'm thinking that there will be one public meeting for staff and parents to give input and then, voila! the person the district wants will be installed.
Anyone know if Garfield APP parents had misgivings about Principal Floe?
Here is the reason every single school community in this district worries - the district has proven, once again, it will change principals willy-nilly and your community is helpless to stop it.
It appears one high school principal will lose a job (not just RBHS) and may not be placed elsewhere.
I believe this may be happening as a signal to other principals to get with the curriculum alignment program or else. (So far there doesn't appear to be any other reason like a criminal act or fraud.)
Meaning, less flexibility/creativity in how teachers can teach the curriculum and principals will be expected to bear down on teachers who don't follow the direction of the alignment.
It also appears the district is unwilling to state whether or not they are closing RBHS for a year and then reopening it as a "transformation" school. This would have HUGE repercussions for the entire district as whether or not you think is something that should be done (or should have been done long ago), the question would be - where would those 350 kids go?
Garfield's boundaries are narrowed and Franklin is taking on more students. I think they will be full. Cleveland is an Option school and Sealth should also be full. Are they seriously going to bus kids up to Hale and Ingraham and out to West Seattle where there is space?
Update: the principal in question is Martin Floe at Ingraham. Dr. Enfield sent a letter to parents today telling them this news. (The letter does not make it clear if Principal Floe will continue on within SPS.) Neither parents, nor staff, nor students were allowed to give input before the decision was made.
I'm hearing that the district wanted someone else in there who has experience with IB AND international schools. It's handy that they have such a person in Margit Moore, an assistant principal at Garfield (hey, she also has experience with APP students), who was a teacher at Bellevue's International School and coordinated the IB program there.
The parents and staff are being assure that the district will "work with you to collect desired attributes and qualifications for the next principal." A friend of mine said, "We'll just say, 'We want another Martin Floe'." The district is interviewing soon and are hoping to name a new principal before the end of the school year. That's a pretty speedy timeframe. I'm thinking that there will be one public meeting for staff and parents to give input and then, voila! the person the district wants will be installed.
Anyone know if Garfield APP parents had misgivings about Principal Floe?
Here is the reason every single school community in this district worries - the district has proven, once again, it will change principals willy-nilly and your community is helpless to stop it.
Comments
Puzzled parent of an Ingraham Senior
-skeptical-
The phrase I heard was that he did not give "adequate" support to staff for student achievement. Interesting how many poor performing principals get circulated thru this district and yet they don't find Mr. Floe "adequate" to the job?
I think this is a push from an over-zealous Ex Director. I've heard complaints about her aggressive behavior at Ingraham (so much so that she scheduled a friendly meeting with staff).
I suspect that if he isn't offered another position that his non-renewal of contract will be a warning to all principals about toeing the curriculum alignment line. Keep your teachers in line or you will be out.
Interestingly, there's a principal in Puyallup who just got pushed out (despite hundreds of protesters at their Board meeting) because he went on a school trip he was told not to and because he taught a class when a sub didn't show up. There's probably more but it seems odd that such a popular principal would get pushed out.
That's school's ASB president asked the Superintendent to NOT come and speak at their high school commencement if their principal was not reinstated.
Thanks
Ben
I can't see how it would be feasible??? Hale has some space with their new remodel but they could not accommodate 350 new students. At best they could accommodate 150 - 200. Ingraham had a couple of hundred vacant seats but they will be getting APP north students next year - I doubt they will be a able to take 100 new students. If south end kids choose to bus up north fine, but forcing them to do it seems awful.
And wasn't there just a community meeting this week about RBHS becoming an IB school?
Hmmmm....
Thanks for the update Melissa
The sources I have for this information are reliable (although cannot be named). Maybe the district is musing through this believing they need to completely overhaul the school.
That the Superintendent AND the Ex Director won't say "Of course we are not closing RBHS" seems odd. If that is true, why not say it clearly?
-nearby parent
Puzzled parent of an Ingraham Senior
The new D 43.00 does not mention interventions.
As Charlie once said: It seems that struggling students in SE Seattle need to go to school in Renton.
So what would an IB transformation at RBHS do for most of the struggling students in SE schools? Be advised that interventions will no longer be mentioned if the new k-12 policy for promotion is adopted?
"To improve a system requires the intelligent application of relevant data."
Now, of course, I am just supposing and have no information, but it just seems that jumping to the conclusion that the district is wrong to fire one principal out of a hundred might be just a little ahead of the information at hand.
We loved TCS for high school, but then the District considered closing it and moved Lisa Escobar (who I thought was wonderful) to RBHS for a doomed effort a year later.
Though it looks like within a few years the schools will all be cookie-cuttered into similar places—and sadly not all for the better.
SG
Also, sign up to speak at the next Board meeting. They had hundreds speaking out at a recent Puyallup Board meeting on an ousted principal. Do the same.
I didn't say the district was wrong to let him go (I believe he was RIFed, not fired but I could be wrong). I'm just saying that it seems odd that staff, student and parents (and there are a lot of them) could be so wrong.
Looking at what Ingraham is becoming (a school with APP students and an international school along with their established IB program), I think Ms. Moore is the likely choice.
Looking at what Ingraham is becoming (a school with APP students and an international school along with their established IB program), I think Ms. Moore is the likely choice.
I don't know Ms. Moore, but as a parent of a north-end middle school APP student, this is outright bait-and-switch!
From my conversations with others, Martin Floe was one of the big reasons many APP families were confident in making the move from Garfield. Yes, there are other competent IB staff in the building, but with all the unwelcome changes around the district over the past couple years, it's moves like this that breed mistrust. The general attitudes and health of a building is greatly dependent on the principal, and I've heard nothing but positive about Floe.
My gut says there are probably 1 or 2 bad apples in the building that conspired with Duesseult. They should be outed and publicly shamed, and Duesseult should be fired.
-- not considering Ingraham for APP anymore
Signature was voluntary, and no-one was looking to see who signed--but at the end of the day, the number of signatures exactly matched the number of staff in the building.
The main charge against him, by the way, is that he 'fails to promote a culture of trust and collaboration in the building.' This, of course, is totally bogus. The building's culture actually one of Mr. Floe's best strengths.
Unfortunately, Ms. Dusseault never took the time to learn Ingraham's culture before she started her work on cutting Mr. Floe's legs out from under him.
Our resolution was drafted, approved, and signed in less than 24 hours. If this response by our staff is representative of a building with a lack of trust and collaboration...I'd like to see what a building that allegedly has a 'culture of trust and collaboration' could do!
superintendent@seattleschools.org
you can e-mail the school board at
schoolboard@seattleschools.org
saenfield@seattleschools.org
District II - Sherry Carr sherry.carr@seattleschools.org
District III - Harium Martin-Morris harium.martin-morris@seattleschools.org
District IV - Michael DeBell michael.debell@seattleschools.org
District V - Kay Smith-Blum
kay.smith-blum@seattleschools.org
District VI - Steve Sundquist
steve.sundquist@seattleschools.org
District VII - Betty Patu betty.patu@seattleschools.org
Got to say it's not looking to positive for Martin Floe. The last time parents were screaming and teachers presented a near-unanimous petition, it was to register a vote of no confidence in Goodloe-Johnson. They were ignored for months. Until, of course, it all fell apart.
And yet again the District is ready to negate parents and teachers and staff at both ends of the city, RBHS and Ingraham.
I Am "Disgusted And Ashamed of Our District Tonight"
ITK
Is Dusseault to SE as their new administrator a punchline, a rumor or a printed-somewhere fact?
Floe made a HUGE positive impression on every APP parent I knew who checked out the program, including me, and I found the staff and environment at Ingraham so positive and easy going that I joked that "flying under the radar" seemed like the trick to staying sane in SPS.
After what APP parents have been put through in the past 3 years, this is an outrage and a really, really stupid move and a breach of trust by SPS.
This is exactly the kind of stuff - dirty politics - that keeps so many families in private schools around here.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss, or what?
WSEADAWG