Work Session on District Vision today

I'm not sure what this is about, but here it is:

The Board will have a work session this evening from 5:00 to 6:30 on the District Vision.

Here is the agenda:


  1. Call to order:  5:00 pm
  2. Work Session: District Vision
  3. Adjourn 6:30 pm
Yep. That's it.

Board Policy 1005, Responsibilities and Authority of the Board, says, in part:
Acting on behalf of the people of Seattle, the Board will fulfill the following functions:
Vision: The Board, with participation of the community, shall establish core beliefs and create a vision for the future of the district, formulate and adopt a theory of action for academic change, and shall formulate the goals and define policies and outcomes that set the course for the district.
So the Board needs to work on this Vision thing, and a work session is appropriate, as well as their Retreats, but I'm wondering where the "with participation of the community" part comes in.

I'm not able to get to the School District Headquarters by 5:00pm to witness this meeting first-hand because I have one of those job things, but I will look forward to reading the minutes of this meeting.

Comments

mirmac1 said…
HMM peremptorily asks "whad ah we doin' heah? Fuhgeddibahdit!"

A vision exists. End of story.
10/30/12, 5:29 PM
mirmac1 said…
I'm terrible at notes but I liked Director Peaslee's suggestion to forestall negotiating the CBA until a new SPS Strategic Plan is in place. I agree, otherwise it's putting the cart before the horse.

Another commenter said we can't come up with anything unless we find the money to take from somewhere else. Wrong. Define the vision, then build your org from scratch (without sending the retreads out to schools as APs) and build a zero-based budget. Then every function and role is analyzed for its purpose and necessity.

All they do now is, well, we gonna to be over on this so we gotta cut that, so sorry.

The vision discussion started getting drowned in minutia like "how 'bout some elementary teachers only teach math, or only teach science then we only have to provide PD for some." Or how the "digital natives" are the ones to teach 21st Century life skills. Sometimes I gotta wonder how the U.S. became the leading industrialized nation in the 20th century without an IPhone app for that.

The asst supts and EDs were there. Everyone felt compelled to say something, even if it wasn't vision-y. Frankly, I think staff (but for Banda) should sit there and listen; when it's over they salute and say "whatever you say boss."
10/30/12, 8:17 PM
Charlie Mas said…
The Board still can't seem to distinguish between vision and management.
10/31/12, 6:55 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more