Yay or Nay?

One school's message to parents.  So what say you: Yay or Nay? 

I was trying to remember if I had done this much but not really.  If one of my sons had forgotten an important report, maybe, but I certainly wasn't going to bring their regular homework.  (Also, we didn't quite make it to the age of kids with cell phones so I'm not sure the office would have allowed them to call me.) 

Comments

NE mom said…
The forgotten lunch seems reasonable. What are they supposed to eat?
I wonder if this was k-5, middle or high school.
8/22/16, 9:01 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
I think if a student forgets their lunch, there is something available like a cheese sandwich.
8/22/16, 9:10 AM
Anonymous said…
Here's the context, NE Mom: it's a private high school in Little Rock, Arkansas.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/08/19/your-son-will-learn-to-problem-solve-arkansas-school-puts-helicopter-parents-on-notice/

Roosevelt Dad
8/22/16, 9:16 AM
Mark Ahlness said…
Here's an answer from Chris Lehmann, an educator I've admired for a long time (he says nay) http://practicaltheory.org/blog/2016/08/22/they-dont-have-to-learn-it-from-us/
8/22/16, 9:36 AM
Anonymous said…
It's high school. I'd think they'd make an exception for medication.

Not sure what this says about school lunch, but the possibility of eating cafeteria food was enough motivation for my kids to remember their lunches. They kept some spare change in their backpacks in case they forget their lunch (or now that they're older, somehow misplace their Orca card). In grade school, where staff was probably a bit more understanding, they were given lunch and sent home with a payment slip if no money was on the lunch account.

-parent
8/22/16, 10:18 AM
Jan said…
Nay -- for all the reasons stated by Chris Lehman (in the link Mark Ahlness provided). I want my kids to learn lots of things -- responsibility is one, but so are compassion, kindness, ability/willingness to work together to solve problems, the art of compromise, and the importance of other people's time. I also want them to approach problems individually and creatively -- so, whether a parent drops off homework could depend on many many things -- is the parent running errands that go right by the school? How important is the homework (can it be turned in later, etc.).

Finally, when they grow up, I want them to have the ability to discern good employers from drecky ones -- and to empower themselves (with education and experience) to be able to avoid employers with absurd and ridiculous work rules -- and to go to work for employers who value employees' time and effort.

If a child has a chronic problem with remembering stuff, and the parents and the child come to an agreement that the parent will not bring late work to school -- then that is a "thing" between parent and child -- and addresses that particular child's issues in the way that people who love him think is the best way to help the kid move forward. But the policy posted on the door does NOT fit within that framework.
8/22/16, 12:18 PM
Blotter said…
The most sexist post of all time. Don't girls/women ever forget anything? My wife has never left house with her car keys the first time.
8/29/16, 7:29 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more