Tentative agreement reached
The SEA announced that, as of 12:18am, they have a tentative agreement with the school district. Details to follow.
From the SEA web site:
We have a tentative agreement!
The Seattle Education Association and Seattle School Board bargaining teams reached a tentative agreement early Sunday morning. SEA members will reviewing the agreement and voting on it at the the Sept. 3 SEA general membership meeting at Benaroya Hall. Registration starts at 4 p.m., and the meeting starts at 5 p.m.We need ALL SEA members to attend this important meeting, where we will be voting on the tentative agreement. Please plan to attend, and please personally ask your SEA colleagues and co-workers to attend as well.
From the District web site:
Sept. 1 - Statement from Superintendent José Banda regarding tentative agreement between the Seattle Education Association and Seattle Public Schools
I want to express my thanks to the Seattle Education Association and Seattle Public Schools bargaining teams for their efforts to craft a tentative contract agreement for the 2013-14 school year.
All of us at Seattle Public Schools value the contributions, skills and dedication that our educators bring to Seattle Public Schools every day, and their commitment to our students’ success.
SEA has informed us that the membership will vote on the tentative agreement on Tuesday, Sept. 3 at 4:30 p.m.
We look forward to having an approved agreement and a successful start to the 2013 school year.
Comments
-IMHO
Just like last time.
What could be worse?
Another lousy contract, incorporating invalid invalid student test scores as a measure of how effective a teacher is. And cost-of-living "raises" less than annual inflation.
Just like last time.
So educators should go ahead and agree to a contract they don't have enough time to dissect, just because not having a contract and possibly striking is bad?
In MY humble opinion, no contract and maybe a strike is much better than signing off on a mystery.
The point of the possibility of a strike is to get both sides to some agreeable position. If SEA members (educators) don't have time to fully digest the proposals, it is a mistake to approve the contract.
I'm sure SEA educators and negotiators are aware of the difficulty a strike presents, but a strike is in the best interests of students if it strikes against proposals that harm students. Wouldn't we want educators to be fully informed as to the content of the 100 page contract before they vote to accept practices that damage not only them but the students, as well? (ALL the points, besides the money, are about issues that impact students, as well. This isn't about the money: they were only 0.5% apart. It's about standing up (maybe striking) for practices that hurt educators and students both.
Educators need time to read the contract and understand it.
"Our teachers union crafted the evaluation document and the measures in it in the last bargaining cycle. The new State law requires a growth measure that is consistent across the district. We removed the MAP test scores in this bargaining cycle, about 4 weeks ago, as they were inconsistent across grade level. But we must have a uniform growth measure in the evaluation according to State law. We are happy to talk about how that might change as we move towards common core. But that is a conversation we need to have in public with all our stakeholders, including principals and parents. It would be difficult to come up with new growth measures that are uniform district wide in the next few days. I agree there is much to be wary of around Smarter Balanced assessments."
-Seattle Educator
Here is a link to the state mandated Student Growth portions of the teacher evaluation system. This represents what is required across all districts in the state. http://tpep-wa.org/wp-content/uploads/wa-student-growth-rubrics.pdf
Another Educator
SWED
- New to this
Agreed - doubt it's great... but McCleary implementation should make the next bargaining in 2 years much more interesting. (Hopefully that will be a 5-year contract to avoid these showdowns)
In terms of inflation, 1.7% last year and 2% on target this year so at least from the district's perspective we're close to inflation. Now the state legislature and their 6 frozen COLA's in a row has even my conservative Republican teacher friends East of the mountains starting to get angry at the legislature.
--SPS teach
Let's remember that the primary motivation for educators is students. Of course educators want to earn a living wage, as well, but mainly it's about issues that ultimately impact students.
Oh, and on the legslity of a strike: They are not prohibited explicity. Some judges around the stste have said they are illegal, but that doesn't set precedent until it reaches the state supreme court.
We need to vote this contract down and use our own PR to get it out to Seattle that we citizens do not support the continued corporatization of our children's education.
ready
Another Educator
But, at the same time, the rank-and-file know what's at stake -- the union has communicated that with them -- and will be able to see whether the deal is beneficial to them or not pretty clearly.
It's extremely unlikely we'll see a strike. If the SEA is confident the deal will be approved, I would expect it will be. And even if it's not, it doesn't seem like they're that far apart, so there's no real impetus to strike. And if they do, then the SEA leadership needs to be thrown out for not representing its membership.
A strike that lasts beyond this week would be a disaster for all sides. In a town with so few single-income, two-parent households, there's little patience for a drawn-out dispute.
parent
But in the end its the members, the rank and file, who vote on the contract. It's a CONTRACT: How wise is it, ever, to sign a contract one hasn't had a chance to review?
If the represented membership decided to give up their vote and just accept the decisions of the negotiating team, then maybe your proposal makes sense. But since they haven't...
Democracy is messy. Those represented by have opinions. While I'm not proposing that each and every member get up and argue every detail (prohibited by rules of the floor, anyway), I think it's importsnt that opposing voices on both sides have a chance to be heard before the vote.
SEA-ESA
Here is a link to the Facebook post that mentions this:
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=584116871646163&id=169703146420873
Ann D.
reader