Tomorrow's School Board Meeting

Assuming that snow doesn't cause a cancellation of tomorrow's School Board meeting, here are the list of people who are testifying tomorrow night:

1. Chris Jackins, Garfield Construction Contract
2. Carol Simmons, Alliance Grant
3. Patty Iwamoto, Arbor Heights Elementary
4. Eric Iwamoto, Arbor Heights Elementary
5. Kim McCormick, Capacity - NE Cluster
6. Tamara Leonard, Capacity - NE Cluster
7. Lauren McGuire, Capacity - NE Cluster
8. Kelly Van Gelder, Center School
9. Caroline Brown , Center School
10. Kendra Wagner, Center School
11. Ricky Malone, Closures
12. Molly Gras-Usry, Cooper
13. Jean Hoppe, Lowell
14. Tracy Dobmeier, Montlake
15. Kenneth Sherr, Montlake
16. Lara Kreyenhagen, Montlake
17. Heidi Kaplan, Montlake
18. Shannon Callahan, Nova
19. Melissa Cain, Preliminary. Recommendations
20. Pam Berry, School Closures

*****

The agenda also includes:
  • Superintendent’s Update the Preliminary Recommendation for Capacity and Closures
  • Chief Academic Officer’s Update
  • Chief Operating Officer’s Update

and the usual assortment of BEX/construction-related votes.

The one interesting introduction item is proposed acceptance of "a three-year grant from the Alliance for Education totaling $5,747,680 to support the implementation of the strategic plan." Details here.

Comments

uxolo said…
I hope the campaign for $79 per student gets publicized, a great idea from contributor on Harium's blog. Each parent/guardian pays $79 and we don't have to close any schools!
12/17/08, 12:08 AM
TechyMom said…
I'm in, and I'll sponsor 5 other kids. I get corporate donation matching, so that will cover 10 kids plus mine. Anyone else?
12/17/08, 6:20 AM
zb said…
No, I'm not in, because I think we need to close schools, to close unsustainable buildings and combine programs. I think this will strengthen the school system, in the longer run, and that keeping all the schools open is a bail out without a plan.

Now, on the other hand, I'm perfectly willing to fund a bailout on top of strategic planning. The only convincing argument I've heard is the idea that a new assignment plan should be simultaneous with school closures, rather than staggered. But, I'd see that as an argument for stepping up the planning for the school assignment plan rather than delaying the closures.
12/17/08, 7:12 AM
Charlie Mas said…
You know, there is a trick to getting on the list to speak to the Board at a meeting like this.

Notice the two names at the top: Chris Jackins and Carol Simmons. They didn't have to call in at 08:00:00.01 to get those spots. They got kicked to the top of the list - regardless of when they called - because they are speaking to items on the agenda. Read the rules and you can make them work for you.

There are some, I'm sure, who think that reading the rules and using the rules to your advantage is somehow unfair. If you're one of these people, I would really like to hear that perspective explained, because I don't get it. My perspective is that work, such as research, yields benefits - as it should. My perspective is that thinking and creativity, such as finding ways to use the rules to your advantage, yields benefits - as it should.
12/17/08, 7:46 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
And once again, Facilities comes to the Board asking for more money to cover Garfield costs for both overruns and "... does not include amounts to settle construction claims."

Settle construction claims? What the ...?

We are now running nearly $25M over Garfield's budget. This IS not right and I know Chris Jackins will be pointing out the obvious tonight but maybe, at some point, greater detail about what happened on this project needs to be discovered.

That's money that could have covered BOTH a new school for Nova and money for SBOC.
12/17/08, 9:16 AM
CS said…
Not that I want to discourage people from donating to the public schools but I think the $79 per student idea is a bad one. It's not sustainable and the district would not be able to use it in budget planning.
12/17/08, 1:33 PM
Tosca said…
Will the School Board meeting still happen tonight with the schools closed today? I would think they are independent of one another and haven't seen anything to the contrary on the SPS website. I've been relying on this blog for my play-by-play on these meetings (thank you!) because I don't believe we have the Seattle Channel for my viewing pleasure.

With gratitude to the bloggers,

Jeanne
12/17/08, 5:00 PM
Beth Bakeman said…
JMT, yes the Board meeting is happening tonight.

I will try to do some live blogging this evening, but will not do the whole event.
12/17/08, 5:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more