I-1240 Debate Featured in Tomorrow Night's Forum


One of the wider-ranging discussions of I-1240 tomorrow night is sponsored by the League of Women Voters.  They are having a number of events and this one features 1240, R-74 (marriage equality) and the tax initiative.  I will be the speaker against 1240 and Tim Ceis, the former deputy mayor of Seattle under Nickels will be representing the yes side.

What is interesting is that the LWV has decided to devote nearly an hour to discussion of I-1240.  I was told that this is because it is a complex issue (and indeed it is).  So this should be interesting.

It will be taped so it will be available for viewing as well (I'll put a link afterwards).  

Doors open at 6:30 p.m. with the discussion of I-1240 up first at 7 p.m.

Seattle First Baptist Church
1111 Harvard Ave
Seattle

Comments

Sabine Mecking said…
Good luck at the debate! I have my "Don't be charter fooled" sign in the yard (my kids like rhyming with it and were wondering whether the pro-charter sign might say something "Let's be charter schooled").
10/4/12, 12:13 AM
Anonymous said…
So I'm curious if Mr Ceis will feel obligated to honestly represent what is written in the initiative...

Oompah
10/4/12, 8:01 AM
Carol Simmons said…
Dear Melissa,

Thank you for debating in the Forum.

You are extremely knowledgeable about the issue and always communicate effectively. We will be cheering you on.
10/4/12, 9:39 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more