How the Voting Going at Your House?

Last I read, King County Elections has only about 10% of the ballots back and, in an off year, may only get 30% back, so naturally, every vote counts. 

It counts even more for School Board elections as the number of people who actually vote for School Board candidates is even smaller than say, for Mayor. 

Proud to say, our household has cast four solid votes for Sue Peters in District IV.

Comments

NW mom said…
And you filled in your bubbles very well, too. :)
10/29/13, 5:41 PM
Christina said…
Although I mailed my husband's completed and signed ballot on Saturday, I'm guessing he voted the way last-minute voters tend to vote. The first question he asked me as he filled out his ballot was: "Sue Peters for School Board, right? Best to get the important races out of the way first."

So yeah, all the voters in our house voted for Sue Peters as well.
10/29/13, 6:01 PM
Leonard said…
Cliff Mass's blog post about Estey and her wealthy backers was very disturbing.

Mass also linked to a video of Estey telling an audience that she didn't know her top five contributors which included Steve and Connie Balmer, Jeff Raikes- CFO of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Matt Griffin and part sports team owner- Christopher Larson.

Voting Peters
10/29/13, 6:09 PM
Anonymous said…
There isn't any polling on this stuff is there? :)
We are voting Peters here too. I am hopeful that $$ won't talk in this election. Hopefully there's a chance.

Cal
10/29/13, 6:10 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
NW Mom, ha! I trained my sons well.

Cal, the powers that be ALWAYS think they know the "way" to win School Board races and yet, I can name you any number of solid-citizen people who were ousted.

10/29/13, 6:12 PM
Anonymous said…
Voting went great. We all went for Estey, after much debate.

Thanks for asking!

-Voted early
10/29/13, 10:15 PM
Just Saying said…
We voted for a person, not a $100K PAC. Voted Peters.
10/29/13, 10:23 PM
Anonymous said…
I'll be sitting down with my ballot tomorrow, and making sure DH fills his out tomorrow night. Tonight I encouraged five friends to vote Peters, and tomorrow I will send them a follow-up email.

~Garfield Mom
10/29/13, 10:56 PM
Anonymous said…
I emailed everyone in my address book that can vote in this race and urged them to become informed and vote! I did strongly endorse Peters and stated my reasons why. Typically, I get very few responses to those types of emails, but almost half of those I emailed said they also voted for Peters OR are now not sure about voting for Estey. This is important - please do the same - share with your friends and family WHY you are voting for Peters! (or Estey, if that is what you choose). We need informed voters!

QA Parent
10/30/13, 10:23 AM
Anonymous said…
Voted for Peters the day my ballot arrived. Since then have advised many others to vote for Peters when asked my opinion on the more qualified candidate.

CT
10/30/13, 5:58 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more