Pinehurst Hearing

I am very disappointed to have miss the Pinehurst public hearing last night.  

Did anyone attend and could you let us know what was said?

Comments

Josh Hayes said…
I was unable to attend, but I have a fair amount of second-hand info about how it went and what plans are, going forward. I'll wait to see if someone who WAS there can step up and talk about it.

-JAH
10/30/13, 1:24 PM
Unknown said…
I was there. It was similar to the last few hearings except this time there were very few school board representatives there and they didnt respond to public comment. There were several people that made comments, and the community weighed in on sharing space with Thornton Creek and merging with Indian Heritage (both favorably). The turnout wasn't great. There will be a school board meeting next week on the 6th of November where people can comment (but you have to sign up ahead of time) and then the vote will be on the 20th of November.
10/30/13, 10:42 PM
Unknown said…
I was there, and was trying my best to capture an image and the essential message of each speaker. I posted images and comments on the Facebook Page for Save Pinehurst K-8, https://www.facebook.com/groups/448159895297434/
I think there were more positive feedback comments from the community, along with the continued frustration at the district at the whole process of disregard for years of threats of closure. On the other hand Sharon Peaslee again, who was only one of two board members in attendance, offering her support along with Betty Patu (who was absent but with us in spirit)was a welcome sight. Make sure to see other comments and add new comments to our Facebook page,
https://www.facebook.com/groups/448159895297434/
10/31/13, 10:07 AM
search4chin said…
I too was there and felt disappointed that only two representatives from the district were present. General Counsel Mr. English and 'communications' guy, Mr. Redman.

The options of combining with Indian Heritage and co-housing with Thornton Creek were discussed and meetings with all involved are happening in the days to come before the school board meeting. It's obvious to me that the district is hellbent on closing the program and finding any way possible to say no to any options. I for one can't thank Sharon Peaslee and Betty Patu enough for the continued support.

If the options of TC and IH prove to be viable, the next step is to find interim placement. The district will of course put up as many roadblocks as they can, but hopefully we can gain more support in the coming weeks.

Danny
Alternative School #1 (aka Pinehurst K-8) parent
10/31/13, 11:46 AM
Anonymous said…
Why is North Queen Anne not being considered anymore?
TS
10/31/13, 11:54 AM
Anonymous said…
Yes, why not North QA building? It has 8 classrooms; add some portables, and there would be enough space. Transportation for existing families would be a huge problem, but for the sake of a 40 year program, a move to a different region is better than outright closure.
-go Pinehurst
10/31/13, 4:46 PM
mirmac1 said…
Fast forward 2-3 years, how much breast-beating and lamentation will we hear about closing a (beloved) program? Deja vu all over again!
10/31/13, 6:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more