Just a Reminder - Director Community Meetings Tomorrow

DeBell Community Meeting from 9-11 am at Cafe Appasionato
Peaslee Community Meeting from 10:30 am to noon at the Lake City Library


I am torn about going to talk to DeBell and ask him why he continues to feed conflict on the Board.  I understand that during the discussion about the CAS, he said some on the Board wanted "control."


It's not about control; it's about oversight.  I never in my life thought I would quote Ronald Reagan but their role is "trust but verify" to voters.   They gave it away with this MOU.


Also, I still have not heard from him about why the superintendent search seems to be a mystery.  There is finally a webpage on the search but it has the vaguest of timelines (with no mention of public input or ability to meet the finalists) and no mention of the the two committees. 


Where's that transparency? 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Michael is confusing "community representation" - a voice at the table, for the first time in a long while, thanks to the gang-of-four - with "control."

They pushed too hard, too long, and too far. Now the compressed spring is pushing back and they don't like it.

Well, comeuppance & karma are bitches, ain't they? Be a big boy and deal with it, Michael. WSDWG
2/17/12, 9:02 AM
Anonymous said…
And by the way, I saw a copy of a letter sent to Lowell parents explaining the MAP re-scoring matter.

Talk about control, micromanagement, and interfering with teachers. Holy Cow!

It's a recipe for grinding learning to a halt if ever I've read one. WSDWG
2/17/12, 9:05 AM
Disgusted said…
"Michael is confusing "community representation" - a voice at the table"

Yes. He will attempt to micromanage te board via media, political pressure, arm twisting, policy 1620 etc. It appears DeBell is the ultimate in

Kudos to Peaslee and Patu.
2/17/12, 9:26 AM
Disgusted said…
I didn't finish my sentence:

It appears DeBell is the ultimate control monger. Similar to the Crosscut article, Times Editorial and Seattle Weekly article(to push 1620)I'm expecting a continued media and political assault on Peaslee. From my perspective Peaslee is both articulate and smart.

Let's face it, we had 4 directors that were not comfortable with the Creative Approach MOU because the board didn't create over-arching policies. None-the -less, the MOU was passed.
2/17/12, 9:35 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more