The Times Still Doesn't Know How to Read
Oh, and now the fighting over charters really starts. Neither bill about charters made it out of committee and some people are really steaming.
Here's an AP story.
Business groups have been pushing the bills, and moderate Democrats have signaled they want to see such reforms approved before considering new taxes. Tom accused McAuliffe of simply following the requests of teachers unions and failing to consider the impacts on students.
That seems a bit backwards. Bring on more spending BEFORE you vote in the money to pay for it?
McAuliffe said she and Tom have been negotiating for weeks and have not been able to come to an agreement on this issue.
"I have told Senator Tom I will compromise on these bills," she said. "They have not moved one inch."
This is a deeply flawed bill. I find it interesting that Senator Tom won't negotiate on it.
Tom said a heated discussion over the issue hosted by Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, failed to resolve the disagreement Friday morning.
Brown said there isn't support within the Democratic caucus for the charter-school bill, but that Tom and Republican Sen. Steve Litzow said nothing would pass out of the committee unless Tom's charter-school and evaluation bills were approved without amendments.
"It's never going to work in the Senate to say 'my way or the highway,' " Brown said.
Brown said the teacher-evaluation bills, one sponsored by Tom and another supported by Gov. Chris Gregoire, are still on the table.
What's interesting are some of the comments especially in yet-another Times editorial on the subject. Here's a few comments from the editorial:
"It is discouraging that two individuals could completely block the dialogue from happening," said Ramona Hattendorf, of the Washington state PTA. "The idea of having a good evaluation and discussing how it should be used is not radical."
Oh, you mean like when people in leadership use their power to push an agenda? That kind of discouraging?
Colleagues, led by Republican Sens. Steve Litzow, R-Mercer Island, and Rodney Tom, D-Medina, refused to take a vote on any bill if McAuliffe refused to consider charters.
Well, okay but you'd have to explain to the rest of the Legislature how one issue would cause you to not do any other work.
But efforts to tie them (teacher evaluations) to student growth measures — including test scores — have been rejected by the teachers union and the Democrats who do their bidding.
Unlike Republicans who do the bidding of wealthy outside interests.
Profiles in courage include Rep. Eric Pettigrew, a Democrat who shares Santos' South Seattle district, home to some of the Seattle Public Schools' neediest students. Pettigrew wrote a thoughtful bill authorizing 10 closely monitored charter schools a year. They would be run by nonprofits, focus on struggling students and could use unionized teachers. Nothing in that bill could lead anyone to think it privatized education.
This paragraph was a whopper.
One, Pettigrew did NOT write this bill alone. Senator Tom even said that to me.
Two, there is no more "monitoring" of charters in this bill than most other charter laws. Which, given national stats on charter school closures, means not as much as there should be.
Three, obviously the Times do NOT read the bill because yes, charters could be run/managed by FOR-PROFITs and there is no guarantee ANY of the charters will definitely focus on struggling students. So yes, if for-profit companies can come in via charters OR Transformation Zone schools, then it is privatization.
Students don't have time for drama. Adults must find areas of agreement and move toward politically doable solutions.
Right, the old "adult issues" diatribe. I'm sorry but that gets really old. Also, "politically doable?"
Here's an AP story.
Business groups have been pushing the bills, and moderate Democrats have signaled they want to see such reforms approved before considering new taxes. Tom accused McAuliffe of simply following the requests of teachers unions and failing to consider the impacts on students.
That seems a bit backwards. Bring on more spending BEFORE you vote in the money to pay for it?
McAuliffe said she and Tom have been negotiating for weeks and have not been able to come to an agreement on this issue.
"I have told Senator Tom I will compromise on these bills," she said. "They have not moved one inch."
This is a deeply flawed bill. I find it interesting that Senator Tom won't negotiate on it.
Tom said a heated discussion over the issue hosted by Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, failed to resolve the disagreement Friday morning.
Brown said there isn't support within the Democratic caucus for the charter-school bill, but that Tom and Republican Sen. Steve Litzow said nothing would pass out of the committee unless Tom's charter-school and evaluation bills were approved without amendments.
"It's never going to work in the Senate to say 'my way or the highway,' " Brown said.
Brown said the teacher-evaluation bills, one sponsored by Tom and another supported by Gov. Chris Gregoire, are still on the table.
What's interesting are some of the comments especially in yet-another Times editorial on the subject. Here's a few comments from the editorial:
"It is discouraging that two individuals could completely block the dialogue from happening," said Ramona Hattendorf, of the Washington state PTA. "The idea of having a good evaluation and discussing how it should be used is not radical."
Oh, you mean like when people in leadership use their power to push an agenda? That kind of discouraging?
Colleagues, led by Republican Sens. Steve Litzow, R-Mercer Island, and Rodney Tom, D-Medina, refused to take a vote on any bill if McAuliffe refused to consider charters.
Well, okay but you'd have to explain to the rest of the Legislature how one issue would cause you to not do any other work.
But efforts to tie them (teacher evaluations) to student growth measures — including test scores — have been rejected by the teachers union and the Democrats who do their bidding.
Unlike Republicans who do the bidding of wealthy outside interests.
Profiles in courage include Rep. Eric Pettigrew, a Democrat who shares Santos' South Seattle district, home to some of the Seattle Public Schools' neediest students. Pettigrew wrote a thoughtful bill authorizing 10 closely monitored charter schools a year. They would be run by nonprofits, focus on struggling students and could use unionized teachers. Nothing in that bill could lead anyone to think it privatized education.
This paragraph was a whopper.
One, Pettigrew did NOT write this bill alone. Senator Tom even said that to me.
Two, there is no more "monitoring" of charters in this bill than most other charter laws. Which, given national stats on charter school closures, means not as much as there should be.
Three, obviously the Times do NOT read the bill because yes, charters could be run/managed by FOR-PROFITs and there is no guarantee ANY of the charters will definitely focus on struggling students. So yes, if for-profit companies can come in via charters OR Transformation Zone schools, then it is privatization.
Students don't have time for drama. Adults must find areas of agreement and move toward politically doable solutions.
Right, the old "adult issues" diatribe. I'm sorry but that gets really old. Also, "politically doable?"
Comments
Do we know the authors?
I'm sure ol' Eli's got a few....
Or maybe he meant, "a broad coalition of coalitions, alliances, leagues, and, of course, Stand For Children, the principal author"?
Hahahaha! Thanks for the laugh today, I needed that.
And which two people is Ramona referring to?
Brian will hopefully do a News piece on this topic.
ALEC Education "Academy" Launches on Island Resort
(heck, EVERYbody is an "academy" these days, even Blackwater! I guess some Reforming privatizers can be one, too!)
And the ALEC who wrote their Report Card On American Education tha doesn't report on education at all, but merely purports to show how many states have done the Reforms ALEC wants...
Check out the appendices at the bottom of the "report card." Two are of interest, the last two. One tells us ALEC's legislative goals, overall (though I can't find a link to individual templates for creating law, such as might have been used here in WA). The other appendice tells us some of the "reform" organizations ALEC likes, including our own Washington Policy Center. Helps explain why the WPC brought that charter salesman from Louisiana up here the other day....
I get Litzow running with that crowd, but Rodney Tom? Embarrassment to the Democrat Party. But forget parties and go to ideals. ALEC is fundamentally against everything the public school system is built upon.
This charter push and specifically this bill stinks to high heaven.
-skeptical-
That's total and complete bullshit - implying that only Republicans do that. As if the Democrats don't do the same thing.
For you connect-the-dots types, ALEC makes Broad look like amateur hour. BAD news.
One excerpt from long article about ALEC: The Kochs’ mistrust of public education can be traced to their father, Fred, who ranted and raved that the National Education Association was a communist group and public-school books were filled with “communist propaganda,” paranoia that extended to all unions, President Eisenhower and the “pro-communist” Supreme Court. Such redbaiting might be ancient history if fifty years later David were not calling President Obama a “hard-core socialist” who is “scary.”
McAuliffe and Tomiko-Santos were hugely brave to stare down this super PAC. This is about more than charters. This is about democracy.
EdVoter
Bubble test question:
How long do you think it will take for the others to accept this fact of life?
A: One year
B: Two years
C: When we're out fighting in the streets
D: Not in this lifetime
if you thought it would never happen here, you are wrong
and if you think there is nothing wrong with this, you are also wrong...
time to wake up, people..."something is rotten in the state of Denmark"...
See: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2012/01/02/the-league-of-education-voters-charter-school-proposal-annotated/
Dora
As far as ALEC, yes, we are fighting some big people. Throw in KIPP, TFA, Broad, Gates and you have quite the crowd.
BUT as we are seeing time and time again, you can fight the giants. Ask B of A, ask the Komen Foundation, how badly the pushback was and how they hurt their brand with their actions.
The Internet is the best thing that ever happened for activists and the American public.
1. I am a member of a PTSA, and Ramona Hattendorf does not represent me or my views.
2. I find the idea of tying test scores, which are influenced by important factors outside of a teacher's control, to teacher and principal evaluations to be deeply irrational.
DWE
--not only irrational but against NWEA's own statement for test use
Can you possibly imagine having your job linked to something like MAP? Can the proposed state evaluation system be any worse than what Seattle already uses?
--enough already
So where is this coming from?
-confused mom
I feel certain the Washington State PTSA is going to Olympia and telling them that members support all their planks when most members were not even told about them.
But come PTSA Focus Day at the Legislature (Feb. 20th), maybe you should let your legislator know that the Washington State PTSA does NOT speak for you.
I'm sure Charlie and Melissa have some nuances to that story, but I think that covers the high points.
-PTSA member v. charters
http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2012/02/improving-education-in-washington-state.html
...cliff mass
http://www.wastatepta.org/meetings/focus_day/index.html - registration page says:
"Join us in Olympia on President’s Day, Monday, February 20, 2012 to advocate for kids – Every Child One Voice. We will march to the Capitol steps for our annual Legislative Focus Day rally. We encourage you to bring your kids, your neighbors, your friends, your co-workers and your fellow PTA members. Let our voices be heard – Every Child One Voice."
Is there an organization that's working against this that I can donate money to?
I really want to see the legislators pushing for this garbage pay a price for their support of this, but there needs to be a coalition to fight this properly.
I had not realized he was a former Republican now turned Democrat. His personal perspective is making a lot more sense.
My takeaway is massive backroom dealings and endruns being plotted.
voter
(irritated) voter
Tom's antics are a sharp stick in the eye to the urban districts he couldn't venture near without wetting his pants. Tell me again, Mr. Medina, that it's all about "the kids" and not "the money." Right.
WSDWG