Debate the issues facing Seattle Public Schools, share your opinions, read the latest news. Organize and work for high quality public schools that educate all students to become passionate, lifelong learners.
BEX Work Session Today.
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Off to the BEX Work Session. Here's the presentation. Will Tweet if anything urgently good comes up.
At least the section about the new downtown school (presumably the one in S. Lake Union) is a bit more pessimistic. From slide 17:
Downtown School • Construct new 500 seat K-5 • City and District forecasts of school population growth in the area are not fully validated at the present time • Potential constraints: Site is not identified; development constraints unknown
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said…
Unofficial playground feedback from a couple of NE parents with kids affected by current crowding: Not voting for levy (yes, fully aware of cutting off nose to spite face, if you will) if South Lake Union school remains on proposal in lieu of other necessary fixes. They said they are generally peeved with the district's money management, even if BEX will positively help their own kids.
I find this unexpected and perhaps a small subset of total Seattle voters. But a perspective to be considered.
EdVoter
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Sherry and Kay pushed back heavily on downtown school. I believe it is weakening. More on this later.
The Advanced Learning Taskforce has not come out with its recommendation (probably end of month) so no news there.
I think anyone can take any principled stand on why they do or do not vote for a school levy or bond. But a good time to take that stand is early and loudly so the district and Board positions the BEX for the best possible outcome at the ballot box
This is no shoo-in and they would be wise to consider that.
I hear that there will be 16 riffed counselors. Ridiculous to say the least. Again attacking the least of these that need help in our student population.
Rif Harman and company. No one would miss their lazy book keeping ways.
Anonymous said…
Oops, you deleted my comment. My sign off was "I vote no"
I vote no
Anonymous said…
Yeah, but you fail to mention Kay's assertion that "build a condo international school downtown and those downtown workers will bring their kids. We'll claw them back."
Where is the data to support this assertion? Was it another business owner or two who said, yeah sounds okay.
There are oftentimes handouts at the meetings that are not posted on the SPS website. You may need to make www.scribd.com a trusted site in your web browser to allow downloads. If you have better luck with google docs, I can do that and post a link...
Anonymous said…
Thanks for posting the timeline. I find it frustrating that the presentation is available online, but not the spreadsheet with the timeline.
I believe the timeline is embedded in the presentation.
Anonymous said…
Melissa - I looked through the presentation. The timeline spreadsheet is not one of the presentation slides. Are you saying there is a link to the spreadsheet somewhere in the presentation?
I don't know about you but NONE of my comments are reflected here. It would appear that everyone in West Seattle and online are hunky-dory with a South Lake Union school. Who is perverting this process and misleading the board?
The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested. It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio. (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read). end of update Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board. To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up. But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting. In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance. - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Comments
Downtown School
• Construct new 500 seat K-5
• City and District forecasts of school population growth in the area are not fully validated at the present time
• Potential constraints: Site is not identified; development constraints unknown
I find this unexpected and perhaps a small subset of total Seattle voters. But a perspective to be considered.
EdVoter
Sherry and Kay pushed back heavily on downtown school. I believe it is weakening. More on this later.
The Advanced Learning Taskforce has not come out with its recommendation (probably end of month) so no news there.
I think anyone can take any principled stand on why they do or do not vote for a school levy or bond. But a good time to take that stand is early and loudly so the district and Board positions the BEX for the best possible outcome at the ballot box
This is no shoo-in and they would be wise to consider that.
Rif Harman and company. No one would miss their lazy book keeping ways.
I vote no
Where is the data to support this assertion? Was it another business owner or two who said, yeah sounds okay.
Dizzy
I VOTE NO
Thanks.
I find it frustrating that the presentation is available online, but not the spreadsheet with the timeline.
North End Mom
I looked through the presentation. The timeline spreadsheet is not one of the presentation slides. Are you saying there is a link to the spreadsheet somewhere in the presentation?
-North End Mom
I don't know about you but NONE of my comments are reflected here. It would appear that everyone in West Seattle and online are hunky-dory with a South Lake Union school. Who is perverting this process and misleading the board?