Friday Open Thread

Just a shocking overnight in Boston.   As Betty Draper of Mad Men said (when JFK was killed), "What is going on?" 

My younger son came home from college for the weekend and I asked if he had discussed the Boston bombings with friends and classmates.  He said not much.  It seems like this kind of happening is almost commonplace for young people.  I am greatly saddened by that.

On the thread, Seattle Schools This Week, I had said there were two Director community meetings tomorrow.  I will check but I don't think they are happening as both DeBell and Martin-Morris are likely to be attending Cheryl Chow's memorial at 10:30 am at Town Hall. 

Great things happening out of Ballard High with members of their BHS Video Production Program. 

What's on your mind?

Comments

Benjamin Leis said…
I have a grab bag of random thoughts /questions about capacity. if the administration were less opaque about its planning process I wouldn't have to sit around speculating.

1. Does anyone know how Madrona K-8 is doing at increasing its draw from the neighborhood? There hasn't been much news about it recently.

2. What does the district plan for the Lowell Building? I'd love for an official statement like we're planning to change the boundaries by some date, or we're planning to add an option program to fill the space etc.

3. Same goes for Hamilton, it would be nice rather than a lot of speculation to have an official statement that there is or isn't going to be an adjustment for next year or even a simple "We're aware of the issue and working on it".

Ben
4/19/13, 11:00 AM
Melissa Westbrook said…
Ben, good questions all. I'll see what I can find out.
4/19/13, 12:10 PM
Josh Hayes said…
I do know that some people from Lowell talked to some people from Pinehurst about the possibility of co-locating Pinehurst into the Lowell building.

I'll be well out of it when Pinehurst has to move (unless the district pulls a switcheroo and throws us out next year, rather than the following year), but this strikes me as a great idea. I think option programs with all-city draw should be located as centrally as possible: one of the biggest problems AS1/Pinehurst has had to face is the loss of all-city busing coupled with its way-the-hell-north location. Locating in Lowell might stabilize the enrollment for the school/program.

But I doubt it'll happen. The district as an institution dislikes option schools and schools which deviate from the standard model, and I think they'll be perfectly happy to let Pinehurst disappear. Maybe I'm unduly harsh there, but I calls 'em like I sees 'em, and anyone who doesn't see the hostility to option schools in SPS is simply not looking.
4/22/13, 8:03 AM
Maureen said…
It would be great for Central families to have access to another Option School. TOPS is not really child directed enough for many families who are looking for an alternative to their neighborhood schools and seems to have become progressively more conventional over the years. Lowell is a little close to TOPS to be ideal, but it would return AS#1 (Pinehurst) to a central location they were promised eons ago.
4/22/13, 9:43 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more