Seattle Schools This Week

Tuesday, March 29th
Special Education Regional Meeting
Portion of the meeting for families is from 6-7 pm at Whitman Middle School

24-Credit Graduation Task Force
6:30-8:00 pm at South Lake High School

Please join us to offer your feedback on how Seattle Public Schools could best serve students under the state’s new high school graduation requirements.

Mayor's Conversation on Education meeting 
Mockingbird Society, Treehouse, and YMCA of Greater Seattle from 6:30-8:00 pm
The 2100 Building (2100 24th Ave S), Community Rooms A and B

Wednesday, March 30th
Work Session from 4:30-7:30 pm
Superintendent SMART Goal #5: Bell Times; and Work Session: Budget

The Bell Times presentation has some valuable history of the bell times issue as well as current updates (including a request from the district for a summary judgment that may come April 1st pending from a challenge to the bell times around environmental impact issues.)

From the presentation, Part Two of Implementation:
Phase 4   Which schools should be on the Opt In List? 
Phase 5   What are the district wide issues that need to be discussed, analyzed and mitigated to support school communities?
Phase 6   What will a school based plan need to have discussed, analyzed and mitigated to support the school community? 
Phase 7    What additional districtwide support is necessary to ensure a successful bell time change?
Phase 8.   What implementation issues need to be addressed after plan is implemented? 

Page 19 of the Presentation then has the breakdown of how these phases should play out.  The Task Force charter is on page 22.

Complete 3rd Tier Analysis for Opt In List

Analyze Historical Community List Change Request for 3 schools

• Concord(Title1)
• Lowell(SpecialEd
• Loyal Heights (BEX IV

Voluntary Opt In List

• ADAMS
• APP @ LINCOLN (CASCADIA) • BAILEY GATZERT
• CATHARINE BLAINE
• JOHN HAY
• K-8 STEM @ BOREN
• LAFAYETTE
• LAURELHURST
• ORCA THURGOOD MARSHALL
• VIEW RIDGE

The Budget presentation is also meaty reading. Page 11 shows that PTA funding is now over 5% of grant funding and is more than combined corporate/other foundation funding.

If you have questions or comments on the budget, you can write to budget@seattleschools.org.

Thursday, March 31
Operations Committee meeting from 4:30-6:30 pm.  No agenda yet available.

Saturday, April 2
Mayor's Conversation on Education meeting
Councilman Rob Johnson and Soup for Teachers, University Temple United Methodist Church, 1415 NE 43rd St. from noon to 2:00pm.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Reading the bell times discussion, it still isn't clear where the 5 minute shift came from, and why - did that actually come out of public comment? I love the new times but was still surprised when (most) elementary went from 8 AM to 7:55 AM

- MemoReader
3/28/16, 7:22 AM
Anonymous said…
I thought this note included next to the PTA grants was particularly striking: ~37 schools; high $450k low $8k;

--PTAssymetry
3/28/16, 8:25 AM
Anonymous said…
That was really interesting. As always, we are overspending on admin, and could have reasonable class sizes if we just allocated to buildings instead of downtown, especially "coaches" and mid level supervisors of supervisors. Pretty tragic.

I noticed two other things- first that they expect "miscellaneous" grants to drop from about 1.2 million to 200k. Why are they all going away? Is that Gates stuff we are not doing? Are they just not counting on it, but it will probably come in? Also that South Shore LEV grant- does South Shore really get a million dollars every year? Wow.

The second is that the SPED budget has increased by 50% in the last 3 years. Has SPED quality increased...at all for this increase in spending? It is my impression that SPED quality has DECREASED over this same time period. Is this just paying out legal judgments? What are they spending the new money on?

-sleeper
3/28/16, 9:39 AM
No Option said…
Boren did NOT voluntarily opt-in! In fact, a letter went home from the principal after we found out about the change, encouraging parents to write letters to the district. There are a LOT of very upset families wondering why Boren is the (only?) K-8 being put on Tier 3.
3/28/16, 9:52 AM
Lynn said…
I think those are schools that have volunteered to give up their tier 3 spot.
3/28/16, 10:18 AM
Anonymous said…
I believe that the voluntary opt in is for schools that may wish to change to a different tier than Tier 3 if transportation logistics allow for it. Having said that, the district really needs to find a way to put all the schools in Tier 1 that want it. Then they need to figure out what elementary kids are going to do when they get released at 2 pm. But I am still really happy that the older kids (and our younger ones in a few years) will have the opportunity for more sleep in middle and high school.

BT
3/28/16, 10:23 AM
mirmac1 said…
The Seattle Special Education PTSA will hold a SECOND March meeting tonight at the JSCEE auditorium from 7-9pm. Our guests include SPS' new Manager of Behavioral Health David Lewis. We've asked him to talk about the district's implementation of its multi-tiered system of supports for social-emotional needs (MTSS-B). Hope to see you there.
3/28/16, 10:32 AM
No Option said…
Lynn and BT, I hope that you are correct. However, that is insanely confusing! Who "opts-in" to protesting their assignment? It should read "change request submitted" or something similar. The phrasing simply doesn't make any sense.

I suppose I will be "opting-in" to having my child NOT take the SBAC... It doesn't make linguistic sense but it certainly has a more positive spin than "opting-out".
3/28/16, 10:55 AM
Anonymous said…
Yes, No Option, it is definitely confusing! I had to go through the document but on page 13 is says:

2. Create a volunteer list of tier 3 schools for consideration for tier change
in the spring if routing and bus capacity allows – Establish criteria for schools changing tiers that is consistent with School Board priorities

So, I think there is still an opportunity to change tiers and I would encourage everyone to advocate for the tier they want.

BT
3/28/16, 6:00 PM
Lynn said…
The district is not required to come up with a plan for after school care for elementary students - it's not their responsibility. I wonder how much staff time (which is really money) will be spent on this aspect of bell times changes? As an alternative, they could have announced the changes last June and given parents 15 months to come up with their own child care plans. That staff time could then have been spent on planning related to K-12. (The high school capacity crisis and the implementation of smaller K-3 classes are two examples of things they should be working on.)
3/28/16, 11:18 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, gr...
Read more

Education News Roundup

From the ever-amusing Washington Policy Center : Vouchers are Pell Grants for students under 18.  Vouchers are no different than Pell Grants or GI benefits, except the money goes to the families of students younger than age 18.  Except they are. Pell Grants were created to help needy students and that's not really the goal of the voucher program.  The Pell grant website does have a couple of great studies on why low-income students drop out before finishing their higher ed and what makes a difference.
Read more