Bell Times Taskforce Meeting Today

The Bell Times taskforce has a meeting to day at JSCEE from 4:30-6:30 pm.

The Taskforce has requested information from staff on the real costs of two versus three tiers and, in specific, how it would cost almost $20M to move back to a two-tier system. 

The Taskforce is in the process of writing recommendations and needs the clearest, most up-to-date information in order to do their oversight job. 

As someone who served on a district committee in the past (as we did not get full information from staff), I think it is vital that the Bell Times Taskforce receive the best information in order to make informed recommendations to the Board. 

Some links to read:

May 2012 SPS webpage on review of transportation.


KPLU story on bell times

Comments

Po3 said…
Moving from 2- to 3-tiers will save us $20 million.

Moving from 3- to 2-tiers will cost us $20 million.

No evidence to support either claim.
5/14/15, 12:33 PM
Eric B said…
Moving from 3 to 2 was expected to save $4M but actually saved $2M in a way that has never been documented.
5/14/15, 12:56 PM
Eric B said…
Sorry that should have been from 2 to 3 saved $2M.
5/14/15, 12:58 PM
Po3 said…
Point is that $20 million is an absurd number to toss out considering that transportation costs are $29,929,040 for 2015.



5/14/15, 1:34 PM
mirmac1 said…
Perhaps they plan on providing Lamborghinis for every student?
5/14/15, 1:39 PM
Po3 said…
I don't understand why this kind of bull-larky isn't shut down from the get-go.

5/14/15, 2:09 PM
Eric B said…
PO3, because nobody on the Board asks staff to show their work.
5/14/15, 2:34 PM
Anonymous said…
After attending one of the bell times meetings, I have no hope that anything will change--even if everything points to it being OK for the district and the parents. It was such a weird and badly organized meeting with odd information that I'm pretty sure that nothing will happen (as usual).

North End Parent
5/14/15, 4:32 PM
Melissa Westbrook said…
"nobody on the Board asks staff to show their work."

Oh Eric, you're so old school.
5/14/15, 4:42 PM
SPS Mom said…
Was anyone able to attend the bell times task force meeting? I'm really curious!!
5/16/15, 8:49 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more