I had a request for a thread on Board Director amendments.
I say the SCPTSA and the SPED PTA should join together and get all the local PTAs to say no to this morass of a mess. But I don't think even the "go-slow" idea will get much traction.
Here's the thing. Past experience shows that there is a fair amount of horsing trading among Directors when these big changes come along. Most Directors might offer two amendments about their region at most.
I'm not saying every amendment will pass but if it was well thought-out and any ripple effects considered minimal, it stands a better chance of succeeding. So don't just say "They should change X." Help the Directors and give any amendment idea legs to stand on.
So what do you think is the most grievous mistake in this third
iteration of the Growth Boundaries plan and how would you want to see