KIPP-like Catholic School in the Central Region?

Have you ever heard of NativityMiguel Network of Schools?  I hadn't until I read a blurb in the Central District News about a feasibility committee doing surveys in the Central region this Thursday and Saturday. They have been working on this initiative for at least a year. 

NativityMiguel was started in July 2006 to create a network of Catholic schools throughout the country and specifically target low-income students in struggling neighborhoods.  They are a 5-8 model with 64 schools in 27 states. 

Now normally, I would not be writing about a private (and religious to boot) school.  But this fascinates me because of how much it parallels KIPP (except for cost).

Like KIPP:
  • tries to reach mostly struggling low-income students; Kipp - 85% free/reduced lunch, NM 89% free/reduced lunch
  • mostly a 5-8 model (although KIPP has a few high schools and elementary schools)
  • KIPP is funded mostly through federal, state and local taxes as well as private donations (15%); NativityMiguel is funded mostly through Catholic groups with a tuition of about $500 a month (about 3% of the cost)- both spend about $14k per student
  • both have extended day and year programs; KIPP runs from 7:30 am- 5 p.m. and NativityMiguel runs from from 8 am to 6 pm, both with summer learning. 
  • college-focus for all students
  • one variation?  Class size.  KIPP runs between 27-32 students while NativityMiguel runs 17-20.  Both have smaller school sizes.
  • NativityMiguel's websites avoid the question of how one enrolls but you don't have to be Catholic to enroll (but they are faith-based).   So I'm assuming they can pick and choose.  They also say nothing about Special Education or ELL.  KIPP takes all students as a public school but they have been dinged for counseling out students they don't want to keep/exiting students they feel are a problem.
If this does come to pass, it will be interesting to see what effect a school of this type would have on that neighborhood.  The NM Seattle website says they would be in the Bailey-Gatzert/Washington area. 

Comments

dan dempsey said…
The tuition statement in regard to NativityMiguel that follows is mathematically incorrect and factually incorrect:

KIPP is funded mostly through federal, state and local taxes as well as private donations (15%); NativityMiguel is funded mostly through Catholic groups with a tuition of about $500 a month (about 3% of the cost)- both spend about $14k per student.

(1) A $500/month tuition raises $5,000 in 10 months, which is 5000/14000 = 35%

(2) The closest NativityMiguel school to us is in Portland: St. Andrew Nativity School started in 2001-02.

St. Andrew Nativity School is the only tuition-free private middle school in the Pacific Northwest.
4/9/12, 12:15 PM
Dora said…
I would like to add that because of the onslaught of charter schools, Catholic schools have suffered. This could be a more proactive approach for Catholic schools.
4/14/13, 9:52 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tuesday Open Thread

The speaker list is up for the Board meeting tomorrow; not as packed as I thought with just four people on the waitlist. The majority of the speakers are speaking on high school boundaries (with several wanting to talk about Ballard High). There are only three of us speaking about the Green Dot resolution asking the City to not grant the zoning departures that Green Dot has requested.  It's me, long-time watchdog, Chris Jackins, and the head of the Washington State Charter Schools Association, Patrick D'Amelio.  (I knew Mr. D'Amelio when he headed the Alliance for Education and Big Brothers and Big Sisters; he's a stand-up guy.)
Read more

Breaking It Down: Where the District Might Close Schools

Update 2: an absolutely fabulous interactive map made by parent Beth Day (@thebethocracy on Twitter - she covers Board meetings and is fun to read).   end of update    Update 1: Mea culpa, I did indeed get Decatur and Thornton Creek mixed up. Thanks to all for the correction. end of update   I suspect some who read this post will be irate. Why do this? Because the district seems very hellbent on this effort with no oversight skid marks from the Board.    To clearly state - I do not believe that closing 20 schools is a good idea. I think they hit on 20 because they thought it might bring in the most savings. But the jury is still out on the savings because the district has not shown its work nor its data. I suspect closing schools and THEN leasing/renting them is the big plan but that means the district really has to keep the buildings up.   But this district, with its happy talk about "well-resourced schools" is NOT acknowledging the pain and yes, grief, that is to come fro
Read more

MEETING CANCELED - Hey Kids, A Meeting with Three(!) Seattle Schools Board Directors

 Update 2: So I have seen a message from President Liza Rankin on why she, Director Evan Briggs, and Director Michelle Sarju backed out of this meeting.  In a nutshell: - She says there was no organization to the meeting which is just not true. They had a moderator lined up and naturally the board members could have set parameters for what to discuss, length of meeting, etc. All that was fleshed out. - She also claimed that if the meeting was PTA sponsored, they needed to have liability insurance to use the school space. Hello? PTAs use school space all the time and know they have to have this insurance.  - She seems to be worried about the Open Public Meetings law. Look, if she has a meeting in a school building on a non-personnel topic, it should be an open meeting. It appears that Rankin is trying, over and over, to narrow the window of access that parents have to Board members. She even says in her message - "...with decisions made in public." Hmmm - She also says that th
Read more